[Peach]

Thank you so much for posting that.

I'd read the father was arrested because he wouldn't leave the premises. Not because he objected to the pro homosexual material being taught to his son.

In fact, I think I read that the school not only heard Parker's complaint but assured him and other parents who also objected that if they signed a letter stating their objections, their children would be exempt from being taught the kind of pro homosexual tolerance that Massachusetts is pushing. (I could be wrong, but I think I remember reading that).

[gidget7]

(I could be wrong, but I think I remember reading that).





Yes, you are wrong.

[Antoninus]

I'd read the father was arrested because he wouldn't leave the premises. Not because he objected to the pro homosexual material being taught to his son.

You people are unbelievable. The whole situation escalated because the administration insisted on teaching his son about homosexuality despite the father's wishes. I'm appalled that anyone in their right minds is taking up the defense of the school in this case.

Do you think homo-norming should be taught in schools?