To: dead
Awesome pic, but maybe it isn't the safest thing for the Navy to have this many assets so close together?
16 posted on
06/19/2006 12:59:20 PM PDT by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
To: July 4th
You mean as if something could attack that? LOL.
17 posted on
06/19/2006 1:00:46 PM PDT by
Pukin Dog
(Dont be a Conservopussy! Defend Ann Coulter, you weenies!)
To: July 4th
That's exactly what I was thinking. NK is supposed to test fire a missile...what if they armed it and launched it at the battle group? Not much of a chance they'd do that, but...why give them such a fat, juicy target?
20 posted on
06/19/2006 1:03:31 PM PDT by
Paco
To: July 4th
Awesome pic, but maybe it isn't the safest thing for the Navy to have this many assets so close together?My thoughts EXACTLY!!
To: July 4th
Awesome pic, but maybe it isn't the safest thing for the Navy to have this many assets so close together?
***
I know zip about military matters and protocols, but I am confident that our guys have all the contingencies covered. Remember, we don't have Clinton's DOD anymore.
172 posted on
06/22/2006 7:48:08 AM PDT by
Bigg Red
(Never trust Democrats with national security.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson