Quite a few people on this site have objected to Ann's choice of words, and none can be described as lib. Moreover, several prominent people on the Right, although agreeing with her basic argument, felt that her specific language was over the line.
Did you even read the posts in question? Go read them and then tell me I wasn't correct in assessing them as "liberal" debate tactics. The person with whom I was conversing chose to discount Ann's impressive resume and say she has no background to stand on because she hasn't "suffered" or "lived".
I'm sorry, but the poster in question was a caricature of what Ann has exposed and I called her on it. I wasn't throwing a "lib" accusation to shut her up, I was pointing out that there's no way to argue with someone who says you haven't suffered enough to be allowed in the conversation.