Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Troops Abducted (TERRORIST GROUP LINKED TO AL QAEDA SAYS IT HAS KIDNAPPED THE TWO SOLDIERS!)
SKY News ^ | 6/19/06

Posted on 06/19/2006 5:40:20 AM PDT by areafiftyone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-158 last
To: cva66snipe
Someone who agrees with Murtha. I see.

The problem is. We have two choices.

1. Find a way to bring the World of Islam into the 20th century, with values like peace, freedom and democracy

(or)

2. Be prepared to kill Muslims by the Million.

IslamoFacism is intent on Global Domination by force of arms. It is propelled by core commands in the Koran that if interpreted the way these people do, encourages the true believer to die in the service of accomplishing this goal by any means possible. And, if Islam is completely incompatible with Freedom and Democracy, then if we let these people win, the world would be much like the middle east, a twist of suffering and evil. Imagine the US ruled by the Taliban. Your children enslaved and corrupted by these people. Its hard to imagine anything worse since the antics of Hitler or the Communists. We are fighting pure evil.

Yet, these people are humans and its our obligation to attempt to save these people, and avoid the horror of a real "direct" confrontation where religion becomes the sorting factor. This is the death of so much WE hold dear. Our values and hopes and dreams for a peaceful world where humans live in dignity and self-determination depend on these Iraqi's being able to find a better life.

The Japanese and the German people have shown that they are not inherently evil. In fact, our generosity and willingness to sacrifice for their freedom and dignity has paid dividends that were unimaginable at the time.

But, understand, failing this, we will not be able to avoid fighting these people for real and for our very lives, possibly with the corpses of millions of Americans accusing the survivors of our stupidity and foolishness of allowing this threat to continue.

141 posted on 06/19/2006 10:39:40 PM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Bump


142 posted on 06/19/2006 10:48:10 PM PDT by StarCMC ("The word of muslims will never, ever override what our U.S. Marines say." - TheCrusader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
Our military goal in Iraq must be clearly stated & resolved and completed and the humanitarian effort abandoned.

This statement is ridiculous on the face of it. I would accuse you of trolling except I see you have been around for like 6 years.

After each and every foreign war we have had to deal with occupation and pacification of the conquered area.

In Germany, the US lost 7,000+ troops after VE day getting control. Various insurgencies had to be put down. Folks remember the movie "Patton" but they don't remember what he was doing when he died, commanding forces in Europe overseeing this process.

Blackjack Pershing got his reputation and began his career successfully smashing the Islamic insurgency/Pirates in the Philippines after the Spanish American war. It took years but in the end, constant pressure and armed force won the day. Only recently have these groups started to rise again because of the corrupt and feckless government that has been at the helm for the last 20 years or so.

Between war and peace there is always a period where soldiers and not police are called to create the peace.

So drop the crap about how the military can't do this, we do it just fine and have for a long time.

143 posted on 06/19/2006 10:58:55 PM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
You shouldn't yield to this guy so easily. He is one of Murtha's Brigade. He doesn't get the objective of this current battle so therefore doesn't know how to win.

Also, its a fallacy to say that Japan and Germany are anything alike. These were wildly different cultures. Japan had to go through an enormous change to be where they are now. Beginning with acknowledging that their representative of God on earth was a mere mortal. Something tens of thousands died to deny.

In the old testament, the people are commanded to commit unspeakable atrocities, to claim the promised land. Yet, somehow, this is not in anyway acceptable in Western Culture despite being built on this very foundation.

Islam has similar calls but these can be reinterpreted and the struggle placed on a plane of the confrontation of ideas.

Admittedly this requires that Islam bend on the most fundamental commands, that of attacking Apostates. For Islam to thrive freely, then it must turn loose as easily as it might gain.

For now, Islam is rooted in evil. But, surrendering to evil or simply meeting evil with evil is just supporting evil. The way of hope and the light is not easy and not without cost.

144 posted on 06/19/2006 11:11:15 PM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: dalight
Bingo. To me, what we are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan is extremely charitable towards Islam. Of course, we have our own interest in avoiding the general conflict you speak of, but the irony here is that if militant Islam is allowed to win in Iraq, it will likely lead to the deaths of millions of followers of Islam.

If our effort to spread democracy in the Middle East works, we will not be thanked by the residents there for the blood and treasure we spent to save them, except by a thoughtful few. It is most annoying.
145 posted on 06/19/2006 11:37:55 PM PDT by M1911A1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: M1911A1
Shrug. Its my kids I am worried about, not theirs, in this sense.

But, do the Germans or Japanese spend hours of sending us abject thank yous? I have dealt with folks from both countries professionally. Folks say, that was then, this is now. But. I am glad to have the opportunity. Good Steel. Not that we couldn't make it here. We just forgot how to do it economically, thanks to all who made that possible.

Anyway, this is about my kids and grandchildren not having to pay dhimmi taxes or die horribly in some genocidal Maelstrom. I believe that sometimes the most selfish thing you can do is help someone in need.

Nevertheless, this is the meaning of being in the National interest. When something is so important that it doesn't matter if they say thanks.

Besides, the French said thanks profusely, see how long that lasted.

146 posted on 06/20/2006 12:08:06 AM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: dalight
Someone who agrees with Murtha. I see.

No we are as opposite as night and day actually. I am not antiwar and NOTHING I have posted states such. I was not anti-taking out Saddam & company and NOTHING I have posted states such. Let me set you straight on something right here and now. We are in Iraq thanks to the mistake of a Republican POTUS made in the mid-1970's. Jerry Ford told the thug dictators of the world they had nothing to fear by supporting terrorist groups. He signed an E.O. protecting them from the threat od death via covert action Look at the rise in terrorism from that point on. Up till then such scum were only threats to their own nations..

Asking for a clearly defined MILITARY objective in Iraq and and end to the humanitarian mission is not Murtha by any means. My thinking is along the lines of the founders and military leaders through WW2 who understood what war actually meant. War is a punishment/judgment what part of that do you not understand? How can it be made more clear to you?

The problem is. We have two choices. 1. Find a way to bring the World of Islam into the 20th century, with values like peace, freedom and democracy (or) 2. Be prepared to kill Muslims by the Million.

I got a news flash for you. Option number 2 will happen and there is not one thing you, me, or the tooth fairy can do to stop it. The one who promises peace in the Middle East especially a peace including Israel will be short lived. It will be wrong. It will be a war unlike any war known to man or will ever known to mankind again.

IslamoFacism is intent on Global Domination by force of arms. It is propelled by core commands in the Koran that if interpreted the way these people do, encourages the true believer to die in the service of accomplishing this goal by any means possible. And, if Islam is completely incompatible with Freedom and Democracy, then if we let these people win, the world would be much like the middle east, a twist of suffering and evil. Imagine the US ruled by the Taliban. Your children enslaved and corrupted by these people. Its hard to imagine anything worse since the antics of Hitler or the Communists. We are fighting pure evil

Which is why you will not hear such stupidity as road map to peace come from me. I'll tell you what this is. This is a jealousy that has been in existence since Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac. It is that old. It is as old as Esau who sold his birthright to Jacob {Israel}. And you think we can eliminate it buy rebuilding Arabic cites while at the same time being at war with them? Look at what I post I said put them back to a 1950's level. For them I could have said to a 1000 BC level and it would mean the same. If you have no weapons, no communications, etc then how can you be a threat? Hardly Murtha now is it? I wrote take out their leadership by military covert means now does that sound like Murtha?

Yet, these people are humans and its our obligation to attempt to save these people, and avoid the horror of a real "direct" confrontation where religion becomes the sorting factor. This is the death of so much WE hold dear. Our values and hopes and dreams for a peaceful world where humans live in dignity and self-determination depend on these Iraqi's being able to find a better life.

Now you sound like Murtha and classic Liberals in congress. It is not our {OBLIGATION} to save our enemy it is our job to destroy them. That is what WAR is all about. You go to war to kill. You go to war to destroy an enemy even if it is down to the last standing person unless they unconditionally surrender. If you can't believe in that cost of war then don't go there. Weigh it's cost BEFORE the act. Do not question the actions of the ones then asked or sent to fight such a war. You want things both ways and they can not co-exist. You want the threat destroyed and you want warriors being the Peace Corp REWARDING THOSE NATIONS WHO ALLOWED THESE TYRANTS TO EXIST AS THEIR LEADERS TO BEGIN WITH.

The Japanese and the German people have shown that they are not inherently evil. In fact, our generosity and willingness to sacrifice for their freedom and dignity has paid dividends that were unimaginable at the time.

There is but one Japan culture and nation the same with Germany. By reading what you have posted I see you have little understanding of Arabic history. It is tribal. The hate is tribal. No less than three likely more major tribes in Iraq hate each others guts. All three have one thing in common. They hate us as much as they do each other. Any two M.E. nations fighting each other today with the exception of Israel would unite tomorrow to fight the U.S. That is the reality. Morally and Biblically we have but one true obligation in the M.E. and that is an alliance with Israel. Our nations future depends on our support to them and not our action as such or friendships with their enemy. Now is that Murtha doctrine?

When Germany surrendered it ended the war the same with Japan. If you do not realize the vast cultural difference between those nations and Arabic nation s and tribes you are in for one BIG SURPRISE. There will be no peace in the Middle East except a short false one given by the anti-Christ who deceives the world by promising Peace through a brokered agreement with those nations including Israel. Does Murtha say that?

I'm not worried about it. I know the outcome. They will loose. It will not be the United States of America who wins that ultimate war. Nor will the United States be the leader in the one who brings victory in that war.

War is hell and knows no innocents. It has been that way for mans history. You want the definition and moral absolutes of war? Read about Joshua. Read about helping an enemy and letting them prosper. Read about those dangers. They are lessons learned the hard way. We have not fought Korea, Nam, nor the Gulf Wars with the principles of war our founders and leadership up through WW2 understood. WE did not fight WW2 to win over the hearts of Japan and Germany. WE fought to punish them until the will to fight was no more. The will to fight is still very much alive in Iraq. Rebuilding their nation while this will is alive to me is insanity and working against the very ones we ask in the name of the Unites States to go there, fight and possibly die. What part of the ones they help in the day time will be the ones shooting at them at night do you not yet understand? Is that Murtha? Murtha like you embraces these people.

War is not a charity drive nor an act of diplomacy. It is an absolute act of the elimination of an enemy via bloodshed including the nations people and anything less is immoral. War is a judgment of a nation. The Bible clearly states it as does history. Do you have the stomach for it? You sound like LBJ to me. Go there troops and fight in the name of the United States but first I have this here list of rules of engagement I want you men to read and go by first so we don't hurt them folk. Enough of it! Your way the kinder gentler war way cost us three wars!

Your way ties the hands of the ones sent to war. It unnecessarily places them at higher risk. It extends the war by likely decades in what should have taken months. You want to re-build Iraq? Fine go there and see how well they like you. In the mean time we have troops being ambushed and shot at and I say intie their hands and let them do their job and be done with it. Keep the stinking Diplomats out of it. Achieve a military goal ASAP, declare the victory, and give the troops a huge well deserved welcome home and rest they deserve.

Oh I want to go into this deeper. Is Murtha calling for a significant raise in our permenant active duty military? I do and have done so in my whole time here. You explain to me why Bush, the GOP congress, and Clown Rummy of Ford, have not called for and raised the End Troop Strength levels we have operated under since Clintons term 1996? A troll? Me? LOL Lookm in the mirror and you'll likely find one and a NWO shill as well. I supprt out troops 100% unconditionally that includes them doing whatever steps they see as necessary to preserve their own lives, the lives of their fellow troops, and their own saftey. If it means killing families they see as threats to them then so be it. Is that Murtha? Or is Murtha just a Boggieman name you were taught to use? I loathe Murtha but you are a lot closer to Murtha in policy than what I ever will be.

147 posted on 06/20/2006 3:56:03 AM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: dalight
Corrected Quotes:

Someone who agrees with Murtha. I see.

No we are as opposite as night and day actually. I am not antiwar and NOTHING I have posted states such. I was not anti-taking out Saddam & company and NOTHING I have posted states such. Let me set you straight on something right here and now. We are in Iraq thanks to the mistake of a Republican POTUS made in the mid-1970's. Jerry Ford told the thug dictators of the world they had nothing to fear by supporting terrorist groups. He signed an E.O. protecting them from the threat od death via covert action Look at the rise in terrorism from that point on. Up till then such scum were only threats to their own nations..

Asking for a clearly defined MILITARY objective in Iraq and and end to the humanitarian mission is not Murtha by any means. My thinking is along the lines of the founders and military leaders through WW2 who understood what war actually meant. War is a punishment/judgment what part of that do you not understand? How can it be made more clear to you?

The problem is. We have two choices. 1. Find a way to bring the World of Islam into the 20th century, with values like peace, freedom and democracy (or) 2. Be prepared to kill Muslims by the Million.

I got a news flash for you. Option number 2 will happen and there is not one thing you, me, or the tooth fairy can do to stop it. The one who promises peace in the Middle East especially a peace including Israel will be short lived. It will be wrong. It will be a war unlike any war known to man or will ever known to mankind again.

IslamoFacism is intent on Global Domination by force of arms. It is propelled by core commands in the Koran that if interpreted the way these people do, encourages the true believer to die in the service of accomplishing this goal by any means possible. And, if Islam is completely incompatible with Freedom and Democracy, then if we let these people win, the world would be much like the middle east, a twist of suffering and evil. Imagine the US ruled by the Taliban. Your children enslaved and corrupted by these people. Its hard to imagine anything worse since the antics of Hitler or the Communists. We are fighting pure evil

Which is why you will not hear such stupidity as road map to peace come from me. I'll tell you what this is. This is a jealousy that has been in existence since Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac. It is that old. It is as old as Esau who sold his birthright to Jacob {Israel}. And you think we can eliminate it buy rebuilding Arabic cites while at the same time being at war with them? Look at what I post I said put them back to a 1950's level. For them I could have said to a 1000 BC level and it would mean the same. If you have no weapons, no communications, etc then how can you be a threat? Hardly Murtha now is it? I wrote take out their leadership by military covert means now does that sound like Murtha?

Yet, these people are humans and its our obligation to attempt to save these people, and avoid the horror of a real "direct" confrontation where religion becomes the sorting factor. This is the death of so much WE hold dear. Our values and hopes and dreams for a peaceful world where humans live in dignity and self-determination depend on these Iraqi's being able to find a better life.

Now you sound like Murtha and classic Liberals in congress. It is not our {OBLIGATION} to save our enemy it is our job to destroy them. That is what WAR is all about. You go to war to kill. You go to war to destroy an enemy even if it is down to the last standing person unless they unconditionally surrender. If you can't believe in that cost of war then don't go there. Weigh it's cost BEFORE the act. Do not question the actions of the ones then asked or sent to fight such a war. You want things both ways and they can not co-exist. You want the threat destroyed and you want warriors being the Peace Corp REWARDING THOSE NATIONS WHO ALLOWED THESE TYRANTS TO EXIST AS THEIR LEADERS TO BEGIN WITH.

The Japanese and the German people have shown that they are not inherently evil. In fact, our generosity and willingness to sacrifice for their freedom and dignity has paid dividends that were unimaginable at the time.

There is but one Japan culture and nation the same with Germany. By reading what you have posted I see you have little understanding of Arabic history. It is tribal. The hate is tribal. No less than three likely more major tribes in Iraq hate each others guts. All three have one thing in common. They hate us as much as they do each other. Any two M.E. nations fighting each other today with the exception of Israel would unite tomorrow to fight the U.S. That is the reality. Morally and Biblically we have but one true obligation in the M.E. and that is an alliance with Israel. Our nations future depends on our support to them and not our action as such or friendships with their enemy. Now is that Murtha doctrine?

When Germany surrendered it ended the war the same with Japan. If you do not realize the vast cultural difference between those nations and Arabic nation s and tribes you are in for one BIG SURPRISE. There will be no peace in the Middle East except a short false one given by the anti-Christ who deceives the world by promising Peace through a brokered agreement with those nations including Israel. Does Murtha say that?

I'm not worried about it. I know the outcome. They will loose. It will not be the United States of America who wins that ultimate war. Nor will the United States be the leader in the one who brings victory in that war.

War is hell and knows no innocents. It has been that way for mans history. You want the definition and moral absolutes of war? Read about Joshua. Read about helping an enemy and letting them prosper. Read about those dangers. They are lessons learned the hard way. We have not fought Korea, Nam, nor the Gulf Wars with the principles of war our founders and leadership up through WW2 understood. WE did not fight WW2 to win over the hearts of Japan and Germany. WE fought to punish them until the will to fight was no more. The will to fight is still very much alive in Iraq. Rebuilding their nation while this will is alive to me is insanity and working against the very ones we ask in the name of the Unites States to go there, fight and possibly die. What part of the ones they help in the day time will be the ones shooting at them at night do you not yet understand? Is that Murtha? Murtha like you embraces these people.

War is not a charity drive nor an act of diplomacy. It is an absolute act of the elimination of an enemy via bloodshed including the nations people and anything less is immoral. War is a judgment of a nation. The Bible clearly states it as does history. Do you have the stomach for it? You sound like LBJ to me. Go there troops and fight in the name of the United States but first I have this here list of rules of engagement I want you men to read and go by first so we don't hurt them folk. Enough of it! Your way the kinder gentler war way cost us three wars!

Your way ties the hands of the ones sent to war. It unnecessarily places them at higher risk. It extends the war by likely decades in what should have taken months. You want to re-build Iraq? Fine go there and see how well they like you. In the mean time we have troops being ambushed and shot at and I say intie their hands and let them do their job and be done with it. Keep the stinking Diplomats out of it. Achieve a military goal ASAP, declare the victory, and give the troops a huge well deserved welcome home and rest they deserve.

Oh I want to go into this deeper. Is Murtha calling for a significant raise in our permenant active duty military? I do and have done so in my whole time here. You explain to me why Bush, the GOP congress, and Clown Rummy of Ford, have not called for and raised the End Troop Strength levels we have operated under since Clintons term 1996? A troll? Me? LOL Lookm in the mirror and you'll likely find one and a NWO shill as well. I supprt out troops 100% unconditionally that includes them doing whatever steps they see as necessary to preserve their own lives, the lives of their fellow troops, and their own saftey. If it means killing families they see as threats to them then so be it. Is that Murtha? Or is Murtha just a Boggieman name you were taught to use? I loathe Murtha but you are a lot closer to Murtha in policy than what I ever will be.

148 posted on 06/20/2006 4:01:31 AM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
I loathe Murtha but you are a lot closer to Murtha in policy than what I ever will be.

I believe you are sincere, but in fact, you are pretty much explaining Murtha's reasoning. He also believes that the war is completely unwinnable, that the Arab culture cannot rise to the level of democracy and that tribal hatreds doom the enterprise from the start.

If you go past the funny sound bites and dig in to the arguments the man puts forward, you are peas in a pod.

Our confict with Islamic states bent on jihad is almost as old as the country. The Barbary States of Northern Africa declared war on the US in 1801. Our first war, and the source of the line in the Marine Hymn, "to the shores of Tripoli."

The rise of Arab terrorism has alot more to due with oil wealth than Jerry Ford. With the beginning of massive transfers of wealth to the Middle East in the late 50's and early 60's, folks began imagining that they could be a "power" in the world. In Islam, this translates to "active" jihad. But, in the face of powers like the US and Europe (especially France at the time) the schools of terrorism began in Northern Africa. The success of Israel also created a group of displaced Palestinians who were stateless and passionate about bringing some sort of conflict to the West.

Its not an apologia to note that this was fertile ground for terrorism, but its the Wahabbi schools and the education system funded by Saudi Arabia that is the engine of the current Islamofacists.

Tin pot dictators have always been taken to task by the US when they directly threatened us and not long after Ford came Reagan who happily dropped bombs on Muhamar Kadaffi's home to make the point that you don't support attacks against the US. So, the whole executive order thing falls in shambles.

Instead, terrorists have gotten support by many of the countries of the Middle east because of a whole raft of reasons. First, they are jihadis fighting the holy war of bringing us "infidels" into line. Second, planning and attacking America kept restive elements from planning and attacking the various regimes in the Middle East. Third, the way of distributing wealth in the middle east is through religious channels. This wealth was used to fund schools and community support activities that also helped stave off instability, but this put enormous funds in the hands of some of the most hard line elements of Islam. This money has supported the Madrassa system all across the Islamic world and the core message of this system is Wahabism.

Now, in its starkness and disregard for humanity, Wahabism is a return to the original values of Islam as lived shortly after its founding. This hearkens back to times we now call in Western Civilization the "Dark Ages"

Its amazing to see that you too are lost in this darkness. I hold out as an example that people have left behind Joshua and see that sort of behavior as unacceptable in our world.

Your whole approach to this problem is undergirded by racism and your own feelings of tribalism. The Iranian state has a long history of Democracy. The US for its own reasons decided to meddle in this by placing the Shah of Iran as king by overthrowing the democratically elected government in Iran. We did this for geo-political reasons growing out of the Cold War. Much bile has been split about this, but now it is history. But, if you talk to an Iranian you will get an ear full of determination to have democracy and freedom once again. This impulse is not foreign to folks in the Middle East. And Iraqi's braved threats of death to go to the polls over and over.

The president of Iran, in condemning the United States said that cause of hope of liberalism and democracy have been proven as failures, and that Islam will conquer the US because of our weakness in believing in these things.

From the standpoint of Old Testament kill them to the last woman and child sort of conflict resolution, the United States was founded on a different set of ideals. Instead, our founding fathers insisted on the dignity of each an every human. Saying that God gives us inalienable rights because we exist, that must be observed and protected if we are to be free.

I understand you don't buy into this squishy stuff. But it is why Americans are special.

I will just go back and say despite your black and vague reasoning that peacemaking is beyond our troops. The US and the US army has been fighting and winning against insurgents for almost all of our history and we are quite good at it. We really don't miss many tricks and its all quite firm. The US is almost alone in our ability to win these deals and its because our army is willing to be extremely harsh while at the same time protecting the innocent.

Come into the light and believe in our guys. They really are quite good at it. Our biggest problem is the whiners and nay sayers who spend their time undercutting and fomenting evil. We both agree that the Copperheads of the Democrat party are quite good at it.. but you are acting the useful idiot to this whole bunch. You are carrying their water while claiming to be just thinking about the needs of our troops. Arrrf.. Jack Murtha be thine name.

149 posted on 06/20/2006 5:07:34 AM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: dalight
I stated : Our military goal in Iraq must be clearly stated & resolved and completed and the humanitarian effort abandoned.

This statement is ridiculous on the face of it. I would accuse you of trolling except I see you have been around for like 6 years.

Let me ask you something. If someone is wanting to kill you by beating you to death which are you going to do? Slap them, bake them a cake while they continue to kill you and slap them again? Or will you simply haul off kick them in the crotch, smash in their face, and stop only when either they are unconscious or say enough please stop? Are you then gonna bake them a cake as a reward for picking a fight with you or will you get up, dust yourself off, and go on about your business? If the bully shows up again tomorrow and starts beating you again how much more severe will your beating on them be? While they are bashing your face will you say hey let me buy you a cup of coffee? Only a fool would.

I have raised two kids. They understood when I used discipline on them a reward for their behavior did not follow it. Praise & reward was only given for doing right.

After each and every foreign war we have had to deal with occupation and pacification of the conquered area.

AFTER THE NATION STOPPED FIGHTING AGAINST US REMEMBER THAT PART? Their threat was no more. Occupation was to our national interest at that time Note key words Our National Interest not the U.N.'s.

Between war and peace there is always a period where soldiers and not police are called to create the peace. So drop the crap about how the military can't do this, we do it just fine and have for a long time.

I served in the Cold War. I was part of the many who helped keep the peace through show of force. I have likely seen parts of this world you have not including going into a Communist nation twice where without the man with the Iron Fist ruling it all hell would break loose. Back then it was called Yugoslavia and it's dictator was Tito. Three waring factions were under control. Not a place I would want to live in but we saw what happened when he died. I was not over there for that thankfully. I have also been in places where the nations people abandon even their own children. I am old enough to remember Nam. When I enlisted even the junior NCO's who trained me were vets of that war. I remember mistakes like Pueblo where an arrogant POTUS ignored warning after warning and sent a crew to be captured by North Korea. A crew that had no means of self defense against what they faced.

Think about this for one moment. WE fought a world war and defeated three nations in 4 years. We are past the three year mark in Iraq. We have troops making their third deployments there. Where is the troop strength increases? Do you not understand we are fighting a war with numbers Bill Clinton saw as sufficient to maintain peace time conditions? September 11, 2001- June 20, 2006 nearly 5 years and no increases despite the fact our congress and POTUS have taken us into war. An unprecedented act. Did you know that IF congress and POTUS on September 12, 2001 had called for that increase the rotations I mentioned would not be necessary?

Rummy is a has been Dunce left over from those who hgave us failed policies in Nam but nobody mentions it because he's a Republican. I served under part of Rummy's first botched tenure as Sec of Defense. We have Never downsized our military at a time of war. I say raise the number of active duty Army and Marines by 100,000 permanent active duty with the Army of course getting 75,000. I say a 12 carrier fleet Navy minimum to avoid dependence on the Suez Canal for carrier transit. I would not have scapped the F-14 porject but rather improved Avionics instead saving money and keeping the King of the skies still unmatched in preformance. What does Bush say? What does Murtha say? You don't know anything about where I stand on national defense or foreign policy yet my bookmarks show it.

Here is a fact from June 1967- April 1981 we sent No Carriers through the Suez not even for the 1979-80 Iranian Crisis. Yet it is much more hostile today. We didn't send out ships alone two day from fleet either. One thing I noticed. Yemen seemed to be the hotbed for terrorist including bin Ladden. We had a U.S. Navy ship attacked there. We went to Iran under a congressional Declaration laden with U.N. Tripe. So where are the COLE bombers today? Bush did not even insist they be turned over to us. What happened? It wasn't that long ago do you remember?

150 posted on 06/20/2006 5:23:59 AM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: dalight
Jack Murtha be thine name.

A Horses {Deleted be yours} Go back to college and Maybe Professor Good Liberal from the Cultural Marxist Elitist will teach you some more spew. I do not have to defend myself to the likes of one like you. Good day.

151 posted on 06/20/2006 5:29:05 AM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

I just copied a statement straight from Murtha. I read it. I challange anyone to read my post in Free Republic and read the post of the one who calls me Murtha. After reading Murtha's statement I saw who sounds like Murtha.

Murtha Statement on Haditha Incident
Washington D.C. - The following is a statement from Congressman Murtha regarding the incident at Haditha:
I am a Vietnam combat veteran. I understand full well the type of situation those Marines were in. These are allegations. I believe that the case should and will be fully investigated and that the Marines involved will be treated fairly by the military justice system.

I talk to commanders and soldiers all the time about the circumstances they face in Iraq. I talk to not only the brass at the Pentagon, but to the officers in the field and the soldiers I see every week at Bethesda and Walter Reed medical centers with their arms and legs blown off by IEDs. I am acutely aware of the type of situation those Marines were in. Our soldiers are incredibly brave and are fighting in an extremely difficult combat environment with extremely difficult rules of engagement. They perform heroically and have been for going on four years now, with very few exceptions. As a nation, we can be extremely proud of the conduct of our US military.

As I've said, I understand the fog of war and the confusion of battle. But we are a nation of laws, including the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice). The United States of America has never condoned, nor should it ever condone, indiscriminate, deliberate killing of civilians. When we do that, we become no better than the enemy we are trying to eradicate.

Further, to ignore this incident, which happened six months ago and has now been publicized around the world, is to invite criticism that the United States does not practice what it preaches. That will severely undermine our goals of promoting democracy, as did the Abu Ghraib scandal. Again, the United States of America does not condone the deliberate killing of innocent civilians.

I have seen plenty of persons in FR the past few days sounding like Murtha. I look at his statement and I read mine. I see no agreement whatsoever between me and Murtha. I say untie the hands of our troops so this is eneded as soon as possible in a military way. {Victory by defeat of Iraq meaning they will not be a threat for decades stones will again be their weapons} What does Murtha say? We must promote democracy yada yada... I could care less about Iraqs democracy let them bloody well earn it themselves so maybe they will appreciate it. It worked for our forefathers. Hardly Murtha Doctorine.

152 posted on 06/20/2006 6:36:17 AM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

The brutal death of these soldiers is cause for celebration from liberals.

Look for them to exploit their death.

They will seek out family members who hate Bush and give them air time.

They will promote the 'sophisticated work' of their terrorist allies.

In the end, these libs will lose because most Americans do not side with terrorists.


153 posted on 06/20/2006 7:46:08 AM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

The brutal death of these soldiers is cause for celebration from liberals.

Look for them to exploit their death.

They will seek out family members who hate Bush and give them air time.

They will promote the 'sophisticated work' of their terrorist allies.

In the end, these libs will lose because most Americans do not side with terrorists.


154 posted on 06/20/2006 7:46:08 AM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
The way to shut up Murtha and other liberals is to bring this to a military end and discontinue humanitarian aid. By that I mean an all out offensive to destroy their infrastructure and leave them hand to mouth existence. No phones, no lights, no motor cars, not a single luxury. Make Iraq worry about surviving the day so the residents will be to busy gathering food to engage in terrorism. Again not Murtha doctrine.

I got a news flash for some. If we built every Iraqi a new home, bought them a new car, and took them food, they are still going to be killing out troops as long as we operate under the current rules of engagement.

155 posted on 06/20/2006 8:07:22 AM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

They are also going to continue killing troops as long as the liberals in politics and media continue to hold daily pep rallies for terrorists.


156 posted on 06/20/2006 8:09:32 AM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
They are also going to continue killing troops as long as the liberals in politics and media continue to hold daily pep rallies for terrorists.

True. But then again Bush foreign policy has given them that chance. The war in Iraq should have been over two years ago in an expidited military manner. We have one captured dictator in a never ending trial {not by the United States} instead of a military tribunal. The man was supposed to be the blasted reason we went there to begin with.

Out troops are catching it from insurgents, locals, and now their very chain of command thanks to some morons in the nations Capitol wanting to fight war in a P.C. manner. That is the problem. Bush needs to end it before we do loose it thanks to media and his own Cabinet members and advisor's.

157 posted on 06/20/2006 8:18:42 AM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Prayers for these brave missing soldiers.

SERIOUS prayer.


158 posted on 05/13/2007 4:37:21 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-158 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson