Posted on 06/19/2006 4:27:01 AM PDT by johnny7
Horowitz has it right. The Democrat party has become the radical socialist party in America. Anyone who votes for Democrats are either in on the scam or hasn't been paying attention.
Another good site:
http://murthamustgo.blogspot.com/
Excellent rebuttal to Murtha's rants.
For the first time in American history, a major political party wants America to run from a war we are winning
I don't technically agree with this statement. We were winning in Nam at one point but the anti-American protesters i.e. Fonda, Kerry and company made sure we lost our honor and will to succeed. The rat b@st@rds!
The Democratic Party is bizarre and insane and must not regain power.
"Anyone who votes for Democrats are either in on the scam or hasn't been paying attention."
Or has bought into the incessant Bush/Republican bashing by the MSM for the past 6 years.
BTW, has anyone seen ANYTHING in the MSM about those papers from Zaq that clearly show WE are WINNING? Of course not. Doesn't fit into the "America is losing, it's a quagmire, it's all Bush's fault" template. /spit
In 2003, Ted Kennedy announced that Iraq "will be George W Bush's Vietnam". This was part of a strategy to launch his protege, John Kerry, as the leading candidate of the Democrat Party by taking on the anti-war effort that he had done in the 70s.
The plan, to turn up the anti-war rhetoric and use the natural desire of Americans to see a war end quickly and with minimal casualties, into a campaign theme. Its a no-lose strategy because every time a soldier dies, it becomes another reason to support John Kerry. Every time something bad happens (and bad things happen during wars), another reason to vote for Kerry.
Well, it didn't work, but the anti-war movement grew a life of its own and the Dems are sticking with it. Is this another Vietnam?
Hmmm...lesseee... Vietnam lasted 14 years, this one is about 5 years old. 3 months of war, and 4.5 years of nation building.
Did we capture the president of North Vietnam, kill his sons and totally destroy his regime? Errrr....no.
Did we kill the insurgency leadership (Ho Chi Minh) and his top 30-40 lieutenants? Errrrrr..no
Really, the only thing that Iraq has in common with Vietnam are the following;
- Dems using surrender as a political strategy
- Media aiding and abetting the enemy
Now, I am ready for US to declare victory and get the hell out of there, but we should do it when the Iraqi government is standing on its own. We will probably have to keep a good number of US troops on bases in the desert to provide a rapid response in case things get out of hand.
But more importantly, we need to get a few more of the cockroaches over there squashed. Most likely, Syria got the WMD from Saddam and Iran is working feverishly on their own.
We need to get Iraq wrapped up so we can finish the job.
We also need to stop falling into the bring the boys home mantra. We are not talking about boys drafted into WWII. We are talking about professional soldiers. Boys come home from war and go back to the factories and fields. Soldiers come home to do what? Sit around bases and play checkers? Note Murtha is not talking about bringing men home to America. He suggests Okinawa. That does not fit the sentimental meme of "Bring the boys home".
Even the new media usually lets the left set the stage and define the terms. That is hurting us here.
Finally, every mobile home that comes up for sale here is bought by an illegal indochinese refugue. They are still fleeing communist oppression, and we are still experiencing the effects of abandonning our Allies. That's not just history. It is current reality.
We have got to start referring to the RATS as the Socialist Party.
"Ted Kennedy was claiming, 'The president’s war is revealed as mindless, needless, senseless and reckless.'”
Like George Hamilton knows toast...
The beginnings of this 'political-disease' go back to Henry Wallace... FDR’s Vice-President during WWII... until FDR dropped Wallace because of his far left views. He displayed unctious admiration for Stalin and committed indiscretions that resulted in release of classified diplomatic data to the nazis. In 1948 he ran for president as the 'Progressive Party' candidate.
However... the traitorous behavior of Murtha, Kerry, Kennedy, Pelosi and the rest make even Wallace seem half-way palatable.
FDR wasn't much better....his "New Deal" comes straight from the playbook of Leon Trotsky....and he sold Eastern Europe out to Stalin at Yalta.
But you & I both know he doesn't plan to re-deploy or fight this war at all. These cowards will follow the tenets of George McGovern & Jimmy Carter should they regain power... the same tenets of defeat that gave rise to Islamo-fascism.
More like the Communist party, why short shrift their efforts calling them 'democratic', which is the last thing they are...
Great Read!
What they didn't have in Nam is FR and we are going to win the battle on the streets too! Flush Turda!!
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
The Democrats have turned back the clock nearly 40 years. In '68, the anti-war, pro-Commie, faction of the Democratic Party ensured Nixon's election. Radical defeatism has never won a national election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.