Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Warnings fly on fears of North Korea missile test
Reuters ^ | 19 Jun 2006 05:13:54 GMT | Reuters

Posted on 06/18/2006 11:12:39 PM PDT by rhainw

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 06/18/2006 11:12:43 PM PDT by rhainw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rhainw
Re #1

So weather won't cooperate. Kim Jong-il, the living god, had better pray to the bigger god up there.:)

2 posted on 06/18/2006 11:17:49 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhainw

Is there a certain time of day that's best for these kind of launches?


3 posted on 06/18/2006 11:18:33 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhainw

No link yet since it was Drudge's radio show, but Howard Kurtz was the guest and he reports it is under serious consideration for the US ABM shield to try to shoot the NK rocket down. I don't see that actually happening, but for what it's worth.


4 posted on 06/18/2006 11:20:49 PM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhainw; COEXERJ145; microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; RayChuang88; Larry Lucido; ...
Speculation that Pyongyang would fire its Taepodong-2 intercontinental ballistic missile at the weekend came to nothing, and forecasts of overcast skies over North Korea and possible showers on Tuesday and Wednesday could delay it.

I wonder if they could put some strap on boosters on the Taepodong missle to extend the range?

If you want on or off the aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail.


5 posted on 06/18/2006 11:22:05 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhainw

I've not followed this issue very closely of late. Something was posted about the NK raising flags "today:" US Relative Time by my immediate interpretation. Apparently nothing happened today aside from all these articles which were based on prior information. Did I miss something?

Thanks and goodnight.


6 posted on 06/18/2006 11:23:08 PM PDT by fire and forget
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhainw

Using electronic warfare to jam the guidance system would be helpful. Just turn the missile back on North Korea.


7 posted on 06/18/2006 11:32:47 PM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhainw
Pyongyang shocked the world in 1998 when it fired a missile, part of which flew over Japan and landed in the Pacific Ocean.
=======================================================================

Either the Reuters writer is a poor writer or North Korea has a missle that can do tricks. If part of the missile flew over Japan, what was the rest of it doing?

8 posted on 06/18/2006 11:34:52 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhainw
Oh let him shoot off the danged thing, the KID wants to play with his toys!
9 posted on 06/19/2006 12:03:43 AM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhainw

We ought to use it as a test target for one of our new interceptors.

Be worth it just to watch em blow a gasket over it.


10 posted on 06/19/2006 12:12:49 AM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Fall in the ocean before getting to Japan, maybe?


11 posted on 06/19/2006 12:14:13 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (``)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
'way back in the late '60s and early '70s the United States fired a few interesting missiles; part of each of them landed on the moon.

What do you suppose happened to the rest them, the parts that didn't land on the moon?

12 posted on 06/19/2006 12:23:08 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

He's a poor writer, but he's technically correct if it's a multistage missile. Parts of the missile separate (and tumble down to earth or parachute back, depending on design or intent) as their fuel is expended, and the next stage fires up - just like the old Saturn rockets we used to launch the moon missions. It's done to reduce the dead weight as the fuel burns off, allowing for greater range/altitude.

The Taepo-dong 2 is a two or three stage missile, depending on what variant they're using. If it's a three stager, it's likely based on and roughly equivalent to the Soviet SS5. This is also the basis of the Shahab-5 and Shahab-6 of Iran.


The Taepo-dong 1 is also or two or three stage missile, again depending on what version they're using. The 2 stager is roughly equivalent to the Soviet SS-4. The three stager is the basis for the Iranian Shahab-4.


13 posted on 06/19/2006 12:26:29 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tlb
No link yet since it was Drudge's radio show, but Howard Kurtz was the guest and he reports it is under serious consideration for the US ABM shield to try to shoot the NK rocket down. I don't see that actually happening, but for what it's worth.

I doubt it'll happen either, but boy, would I love it if it did.

14 posted on 06/19/2006 12:38:39 AM PDT by Dont Mention the War (This tagline is false.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
"I doubt it'll happen either, but boy, would I love it if it did."

If the little fat boy hired a Jihadist from a local mosk to do the wiring, it'll blow up on the launch pad.

15 posted on 06/19/2006 2:35:56 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rhainw
Warnings fly on fears of North Korea missile test

Kim "I'm Ill" could care less about any warnings.

Any "ruler" who will starve his own people to buy technology he has no need of, isn't going to spend his nights worrying about warnings from the US and Japan.

His ego is more important. He's going to do it and the N. Koreans occupying his slave camp will pay the consequenses for his recklessness.
16 posted on 06/19/2006 3:10:51 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Is this a Russian or a Chinese design?


17 posted on 06/19/2006 3:26:13 AM PDT by Srirangan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War

That was not Howard Kurtz, the media analyst. It was Bill Goertz of the Washington Times, a very tapped in security analyst.


18 posted on 06/19/2006 3:53:07 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rhainw; Paleo Conservative

Good opportunity to test our ballistic missile defense systems.


19 posted on 06/19/2006 5:12:09 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhainw
Let's all thank Bill Clinton for his delusional 1994 "Agreed Framework" plan in which he *gave* North Korea two twin, light water nuclear reactors. Clinton called it his 'plan' so that Congress wouldn't get to vote on it. All that was required of North Korea was that they sign a piece of paper stating that they wouldn't use the two nuke reactors to make nuclear bombs. North Korea promptly tore up the paperwork /dumped it in the trash and they've been pulling plutonium from the spent fuel rods ever since.

Hence, it was Bill Clinton and the democrats who fully armed North Korea with nuclear bombs.

20 posted on 06/19/2006 5:15:27 AM PDT by Sic Luceat Lux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson