Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran: U.S. Making Nuke Talks Difficult
Associated Press by way of Forbes ^ | 18JUN06 | NASSER KARIMI

Posted on 06/18/2006 12:51:43 PM PDT by familyop

Iran accused the United States on Sunday of steering Europe away from a possible compromise on Tehran's disputed nuclear program.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi said the U.S. insistence on conditional negotiations over a Western package of incentives has narrowed the scope of possible talks and made it tougher for all parties to reach a solution.

The incentives are meant to persuade Iran to stop enriching uranium, a process that can make nuclear fuel for a power plant or fissile material for an atomic bomb.

"We feel that the Americans are trying to take Europe to a point that the case could not be easily solvable," Asefi said. "The U.S. said it gave a deadline to Iran to respond to the package, but that is not correct. Again, they mix different issues and that is not appropriate."

Asefi reiterated that enriching uranium was his country's unalienable right, and that talks must be unconditional. He said Iranian officials were reviewing the package, and Iran would propose amendments to the deal.

"We have formed different committees to review the package. When the committees have concluded, we will send our answer to the Europeans immediately," Asefi said.

Iran has called the package a "step forward," saying some of the incentives were acceptable and calling for changes in others. It also said that the central issue of uranium enrichment needed clarification.

In Washington, White House spokesman Tony Snow said Iran must take the next step if it wished to cooperate with the international community and qualify for the incentives.

"The Iranian government needs to suspend all uranium enrichment-related and reprocessing activities," Snow told CNN's "Late Edition." "Once they do that, once that is done, they can sit down at the table."

Iran denies accusations by the United States and others that it is seeking to develop nuclear weapons, saying its program would only generate electricity.

European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana presented the package of perks and possible penalties to Tehran on June 6. The package was drawn up by the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council - the United States, Britain, China, France and Russia - and Germany.

Crucially, the package calls on Iran to suspend, not permanently halt, uranium enrichment as a condition for the start of talks, although the negotiations are aimed at achieving Iranian acceptance long-term moratorium on such activities.

Secretary-General Kofi Annan urged Iran to accept the package.

"I can see that they take the offer seriously and I hope they will respond in a not too distant future," Annan said while visiting Denmark.

Iran so far has said it will not give up its right under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty to enrich uranium and produce nuclear fuel, though Tehran has indicated that it may temporarily suspend uranium enrichment to ease tensions.

The package included some significant concessions by the United States, including providing Iran with peaceful nuclear technology, lifting some sanctions and joining direct negotiations with Tehran.

However, it also contains the implicit threat of U.N. sanctions if Iran remains defiant.

Associated Press reporter Jan M. Olsen in Copenhagen, Denmark, contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ambiguousness; asefi; britain; enrichment; foreign; france; hamid; iran; irannuke; irannukes; ministry; nuclear; on; proliferation; reza; spokesman; terror; uranium; war; weapons
The truth of the matter is that Iran is refusing to accept the offer put together by western Europe and agreed-to by our US leaders. Iran's tactic has been and is to give about two messages in each reply: one for and one against negotiating. ...seem familiar? See "jihad of words" and "jihad of deception" in the following.

JIHAD – ISLAMIC HOLY WAR
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/535168/posts

1 posted on 06/18/2006 12:51:46 PM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: familyop

Nuke talks are less difficult than avoiding the bouncing rubble from Nukes Incoming.....

Semper Fi


2 posted on 06/18/2006 12:55:06 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

When talks are fruitless, it makes 100% sense to make them difficult. So, what is the problem here?


3 posted on 06/18/2006 12:59:14 PM PDT by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Aren't they just playing for time?

And why are we letting them?


4 posted on 06/18/2006 1:06:28 PM PDT by BenLurkin ("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Aren't they just playing for time?

Of course -

And why are we letting them?

No real better alternative at the current time - The reality is "time" is on our side in the short run -

5 posted on 06/18/2006 1:12:02 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: familyop

"Reporting" by AP propagandist NASSER KARIMI...


6 posted on 06/18/2006 1:14:08 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

"Iran accused the United States on Sunday of steering Europe away from a possible compromise on Tehran's disputed nuclear program."

Iran's objective has always been to split Europe away from the United States so that the United States is isolated. It remains to be seen what the Europeans will see as their chief interest - obtaining Iranian contracts and oil or preventing Iran from threatening Europe with nuclear-tipped missiles. (The Europeans seem to be somewhat chastened after learning that Europe is within reach of Iran's missiles.)


7 posted on 06/18/2006 1:52:35 PM PDT by RAldrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Bump


8 posted on 06/18/2006 2:07:22 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Gentleman, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room - Dr. Strangelove)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat

ditto


9 posted on 06/18/2006 3:39:55 PM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: familyop

File this under:

"Parents make teenage partying difficult"
or
"Cops make Bank Robbing difficult"
or
"Armed citizenry makes mugging more difficult"


10 posted on 06/18/2006 4:02:35 PM PDT by rlmorel (John Murtha: Out of touch, Out of His Mind. Lets make him Out of Congress! DIANA IREY FOR CONGRESS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson