Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: topher

If they can be acquired and retargeted, missiles have the distinct disadvantage of having to endure almost every vibrational mode in their structural integrity as their mass is constantly changing. This implies that it only take s a very slight destruction of their structural properties in one area of their span to result in the missile tearing itself apart in catastrophic failure.

I've always suspected the Columbia space shuttle failure was more due to a laser strike on say a 3" to 6" portion of the structure than to improper design and fabrication.

Of course it might not be the best strategy to destroy the missile on the launch pad when its a demonstration, instead of waiting for the proper time and place for an attack that might tip your hand of your capacity.


1,396 posted on 06/18/2006 6:19:29 PM PDT by Cvengr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1388 | View Replies ]


To: Cvengr

Of course it might not be the best strategy to destroy the missile on the launch pad when its a demonstration, instead of waiting for the proper time and place for an attack that might tip your hand of your capacity.
- - -

I much agree with that.

Too bad too few in power are that reasonable.


1,397 posted on 06/18/2006 6:23:41 PM PDT by Quix (PRAY AND WORK WHILE THERE'S DAY! Many very dark nights are looming. Thankfully, God is still God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1396 | View Replies ]

To: Cvengr
I would agree with everything except there is a difference between targeting a stationary target and a missile that has been fired (mach 5+).

Sabotage on the ground might also be a way to do this - or use a stealth weapon where the enemy might have trouble determining if the destruction on the ground was caused by saboteurs or some weapon fired from a distance.

Example would be causing an explosion of the rocket fuel farm used to fuel the rocket. Knowing a way to cause the rocket fuel to explode without being able to trace why it exploded might cause embarrasment for the rogue state (North Korea), and still protect how.

The TV series Alias would suggest a number of ways, but also something that could penetrate defenses undetected (UAV) and cause this to happen.

I guess the short of my response is that it is harder to hit a moving target (missile in flight). But that does not make it impossible...

In the case of this test firing, there is a lot of concern that this missile must fly over Japan or some other country as part of the test. Destroying it just as it leaves North Korean airspace or on the ground might have advantages.

I imagine there are a number of different computers around the world analyzing this situation just because of the complexities and the possible ramifications - as well as the human resources required...

1,398 posted on 06/18/2006 6:45:17 PM PDT by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1396 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson