Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie
There is a difference between being cosmopolitan and unpatriotic.

Benjamin Franklin, for example, was cosmopolitan but hardly unpatriotic.

Not so with todays elites. They are wholly unpatriotic, godless, and in open revolt against traditional American values.
3 posted on 06/17/2006 6:09:51 PM PDT by TSchmereL ("Rust but terrify.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: TSchmereL
Not so with todays elites. They are wholly unpatriotic, godless, and in open revolt against traditional American values.

Well, they tend to be secular, which has a positive correlation with education, but the rest is simply silly. Granted, one must define "American values." They can be defined in a way, that makes the conclusion ineluctible by the definer.

6 posted on 06/17/2006 6:25:37 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: TSchmereL

Ditto times 10 to your post.


78 posted on 06/18/2006 3:10:36 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: TSchmereL
There is a difference between being cosmopolitan and unpatriotic.

Benjamin Franklin is a good example, but I still think that cosmopolitanism is at odds with patriotism. Franklin was able to be a patriot because he put his patriotism ahead of his cosmopolitanism, not because there was no tension between the two--- this can be seen in his estrangement from his own son, who remained loyal to England.

84 posted on 06/18/2006 3:19:48 PM PDT by mjolnir ("All great change in America begins at the dinner table.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson