"It's your source that is faulty ..."
I WILL LET THE MAN SPEAK FOR HIMSELF:
http://prophetofdoom.net/article.aspx?g=401&i=40001
(snipped)
As for the “misquoted” allegation, we have provided you with a parallel copy of the five Qur’an translations that were used to write Prophet of Doom. These represent the five most universally acclaimed Muslim translations, from the most literal (the Noble Qur’an) to the most contemporary (Ahmed Ali). Five were required because there are many missing and meaningless words in Allah’s book. By using the five most accepted Islamic renditions of the Qur’an we provide a consensus as to what the foremost paleo-Arabic scholars propose Muhammad claimed Allah was trying to say.
In addition to this online collection of five Qur’ans, we have added the POD Qur’an to the site so that you can set them side by side to verify for yourself that we have presented the Qur’an comprehensively and accurately. However, the best way to understand Islam is to read Prophet of Doom, since it presents the Qur’an chronologically, in the order it was revealed, and in the context of Muhammad’s life as it is evidenced in the Sira, Ta’rikh, and Hadith.
-----
And don't forget, there's also the link to the free pdf on my bio page...if you are interested in the historical mohammad. The source notes are from the arabic and ancient greek in their original.
"I WILL LET THE MAN SPEAK FOR HIMSELF:"
... and by his own words he is proven to edit the quote of Sura 9:5
Why do YOU think he chose to leave out the portion that shows that this applies during a time of war ?
... and the previous verse 9:4, which specifically mentions the possibility of a treaty of peace with their enemy ?