Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marine Ospreys exploring long-range deployments
gizmag ^ | 17 June 2006

Posted on 06/17/2006 6:41:18 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
Comment #61 Removed by Moderator

To: jk4hc4

No offense taken.


62 posted on 06/18/2006 3:09:50 PM PDT by Beckwith (The liberal media has picked sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: jk4hc4
The Marines didn't even want this did they?

No, they wanted it in the worst possible way--which is how the got it.

63 posted on 06/18/2006 3:10:37 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jk4hc4
You misunderstood the assignment, which isn't surprising. I'm not interested in the number of Marines lost in the H-60 since the only Marine Corps squadron that operates an H-60 variant; VH-60N, is HMX-1 and I already know how many Marines were killed; four, in the single fatal crash of that type in 1993. I want you to determine, accurately, the number of fatalities in the H-60s operated by the Army, Navy, Air Force and Coast Guard. Any questions?
64 posted on 06/18/2006 3:11:16 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Yep!! The craft is the BOEING V=22 Osprey !!!!


65 posted on 06/18/2006 4:28:44 PM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: SICSEMPERTYRANNUS
I wonder if they have learned how to induce vortex ring state, for traning purposes, on the V-22.

The interesting this is that they found the V-22 induce vortex ring state is very ease to get out of(unlike a helicopter)just tilt the rotors forwarded and power out...

Bottom line you don't fly a plane like a helicopter and you don't fly a helicopter like a plane...And VSTOL aircraft like the Harrier and the Ospreys you don't fly like either a helicopter or plane

...The Harrier was considerer a widow maker till the this hard lesson was learned

66 posted on 06/18/2006 4:56:44 PM PDT by tophat9000 (If it was illegal French Canadians would La Raza back them? Racist back their race over country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

My question:

". . . but when will it carry a squad of Marines from Kandahar into [the] mountains that border Pakistan?"

Your answer:

"How long does it take to break down and load a CH-53E onto a C-5 or C-17, fly it to theater, reassemble it and conduct a PMCF before it can be used tactically?"

I'll take that as an, "I don't know."


67 posted on 06/18/2006 5:08:40 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
I am glad to see the V-22 is finally being implemented.

I have to admit, when I first saw drawings for this Aircraft in the Navy Times back in '92 I thought they had made an obvious mistake...it can't land and take off with it's engines horizontal.

I am surprised and disappointed at how many FReepers keep tossing out old, long refuted arguments against the V-22.

68 posted on 06/18/2006 5:41:48 PM PDT by SC Swamp Fox (Join our Folding@Home team (Team# 36120) keyword: folding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Tomorrow I will be with a number of Marines who would be in the know. I will get back to you.


69 posted on 06/18/2006 6:07:48 PM PDT by Recon Dad (Marine Spec Ops Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

I guess you either don't know the answer or the number is embarrassingly low.


70 posted on 06/18/2006 6:56:46 PM PDT by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

What a joke!

A prop driven plane has been in development for 25 years and it' Cheney's fault?!?!?!?

LOL!!!!


71 posted on 06/18/2006 6:59:12 PM PDT by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Even if the tanks are carried inboard it seems likely that they can be rolled out of the stern door.


72 posted on 06/19/2006 7:00:49 AM PDT by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Basic aeronautics:

Any aircraft has a Max Gross Takeoff weight.
Fuel contributes to that calculation and thus REDUCES THE ALLOWABLE CARGO WEIGHT!


73 posted on 06/19/2006 10:57:40 AM PDT by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Obviously. But the idea is to prove endurance and, in this case, reduce air tanking. It's a long-range ferry demonstration.


74 posted on 06/19/2006 11:41:04 AM PDT by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Unlike you, pogue, I know plenty.


75 posted on 06/25/2006 11:39:11 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
How Clintonesque of you to parse your original statement:

This is great if we need to get troops from New River to Farnbourgh, but when will it carry a squad of Marines from Kandahar into mountains that border Pakistan?

Since the aircraft hasn't deployed to theater yet we don't have the answer to your simpleton question.

Now answer the one that was posed to you.

76 posted on 06/25/2006 11:43:40 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

You rode that short yellow bus to school, didn't you.


77 posted on 06/25/2006 11:44:35 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad
Since you haven't gotten back to me, read this:

http://www.boeing.com/rotorcraft/military/v22/tilttimes/sept05.pdf

78 posted on 06/25/2006 11:47:01 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Even a simpleton knows that in order for the Osprey to carry a squad of Marines into harm's way, it must first be deployed to the AO. In your typical smarmy way, you've answered the relevant question. You, not "we," don't know. Since you know "plenty," it must not be known whether or not the Osprey will be supporting the troops in this war or the next one.

As far as your question goes, please, dazzle me. I don't know.


79 posted on 06/25/2006 1:08:48 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Sorry, I looked back to last Wednesday and I swear I wrote you. Well, someone else must have got it. You were correct, they are being used. My son hasen't been on one yet, but over the next 12 months he expects they will.


80 posted on 06/25/2006 1:22:05 PM PDT by Recon Dad (Marine Spec Ops Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson