Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers
So if she Lexis-Nexis for "circumstantial" + "Coplon" and sees an article from a Seattle paper, it's easy to make a note of it as "a liberal source" (playing the averages) without actually reading the thing.

If you think she can really be that careless, then why believe anything she has to say?

246 posted on 06/16/2006 10:45:51 PM PDT by JTN ("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]


To: JTN
Because with *THAT* remark, you've revealed yourself as a troll.

The relevant questions are, what are the accuracy rate? Was it intended as a specific remark, or to illustrate a larger point? Was it careless, reckless, a lie, a damn lie, or a statistic?

Jumping the gun like you just did is not the way to bolster your credibility anywhere except on DU.

Cheers!

250 posted on 06/16/2006 10:57:00 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson