[Steve Van Doorn]

"Obviously he has accepted the evidence that she is a spy"

He did NOT. He said, 'she is a spy' in his article which is true... but he wrote his article BOTH ways. He stated she was innocent and guilty in the same dam article. It is nothing but double talk.

Try and explain to me how this artical wasn't just double speek.

[JTN]

He did NOT. He said, 'she is a spy' in his article which is true... but he wrote his article BOTH ways. He stated she was innocent and guilty in the same dam article. It is nothing but double talk. Try and explain to me how this artical wasn't just double speek.

Easy. He said that the court case that was presented against Coplon was circumstantial, but that looking at evidence that, for security reasons, was not used in court, one can easily see that she was actually guilty. It's really not that hard to understand.