[JTN]

He did NOT. He said, 'she is a spy' in his article which is true... but he wrote his article BOTH ways. He stated she was innocent and guilty in the same dam article. It is nothing but double talk. Try and explain to me how this artical wasn't just double speek.

Easy. He said that the court case that was presented against Coplon was circumstantial, but that looking at evidence that, for security reasons, was not used in court, one can easily see that she was actually guilty. It's really not that hard to understand.

[Steve Van Doorn]

”case that was presented against Coplon was circumstantial”

This is TRUE AFTER the courts threw the content of her bag out because it was an improper search.

Ramsey stated she had a right to have the documents in her purse. This was totally a lie. The documents where stolen.