Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LetsRok

He may have been not guilty of those charges, but he's guilty of betraying his constituents of which I was one for many years. He said once at the outset of the BC debacle over lying to judges and grand juries (lower case because they don't deserve better) that he would " Hold President Clinton accountable for both legal and MORAL (as in Monica) malfeasance." He promptly was caught almost 6 months later with his own uh....member, dipping where it shouldn't have been. All the while NEVER doing what he said he'd do. Newt can stay in obscurity.


9 posted on 06/16/2006 3:22:20 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer
but he's guilty of betraying his constituents of which I was one for many years.

Ditto!

I voted for him multiple times and could have forgiven him his peccadillos. It should have had nothing to do with the job I depended on him to do in Washington.

Then he ran off like an embarrassed nancy boy. The effect was to help fix in the sheeples minds that Clintoon's situation was just Moral Majority harassment. For Newt to be so smart, that was pretty dumb.

I also always thought Mary Anne was a very nice lady and I can't help thinking that Newt is a sullen and moody person in private which isn't a good character trait for the loneliest job in the world. [Proper deference to Kim Jong-Il.]

It would vote for him again but only to keep a Socialist out of the WH.

29 posted on 06/16/2006 5:35:17 PM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson