Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Wants 'Privacy Bill of Rights'
Newsmax - AP ^

Posted on 06/16/2006 2:32:12 PM PDT by V.Foster

Hillary Wants 'Privacy Bill of Rights'

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, drawing on her experiences as a young Watergate lawyer who decades later was investigated as first lady, urged creation of a "privacy bill of rights" Friday to protect people's personal data.

"Modern life makes many things easier and many things easier to know, and yet privacy is somehow caught in the crosshairs of these changes," Clinton said in a speech to a left-leaning legal group.

Clinton's speech on protecting consumers from identity theft and citizens from government snooping was the latest in a series of talks billed as "major addresses" by aides. Previous speeches were on energy and the economy.

A potential presidential candidate in 2008 whose eight years as first lady were marked by numerous investigations, Clinton noted her work on a House committee investigating the Nixon administration's illegal snooping and other abuses.

And she ruefully called herself an "expert" in the loss of privacy.

"Having lost so much of my own privacy in recent years I have a deep appreciation of its value and a firm commitment to protecting it for all the rest of you," she said, prompting laughter from the audience of the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy.

Clinton wants to create a "privacy czar" within the White House to guard against recent problems like the theft of personal data from the Department of Veterans Affairs.

She also wants legislation to let consumers know what information companies are keeping about them and how it is used, and create a tiered system of penalties for companies who are not careful with consumer data.

Clinton also waded into the debate over anti-terror eavesdropping. For months Democrats have hammered at the Bush administration over the National Security Agency's program of domestic wiretapping without warrants from judges. The administration insists it is both legal and necessary.

Clinton said any president should have the latest technology to track terrorists, but within laws that provide for oversight by judges.

"The administration's refrain has been, "Trust us,'" said Clinton. "That's unacceptable. Their track record doesn't warrant our trust. ... Unchecked mass surveillance without judicial review may sometimes be legal but it is dangerous. Every president should save those powers for limited critical situations."

© 2006 Associated Press.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; clinton; fbifiles; hillary; hillaryclinton; privacy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
No mention of her FBI files?
1 posted on 06/16/2006 2:32:13 PM PDT by V.Foster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: V.Foster

Ya know.....travel office workers are a special case....ya know....?


2 posted on 06/16/2006 2:34:12 PM PDT by Niteranger68 (Ninguna tarjeta verde. Ningún Inglés. Ningún servicio.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V.Foster

Hillary is such a hypocrite!


3 posted on 06/16/2006 2:35:56 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V.Foster

Guess they went into the memory hole.


4 posted on 06/16/2006 2:36:03 PM PDT by BenLurkin ("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V.Foster

Is Jaime Gorelick a consultant on this?


5 posted on 06/16/2006 2:36:14 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V.Foster

They can make any privacy law they want. But if the Government violates it, it's ok, because the Government can do what it wants.


6 posted on 06/16/2006 2:36:39 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V.Foster

This witch did not want Nixon to have legal counsel.


7 posted on 06/16/2006 2:36:40 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V.Foster

Gee, and all along I thought there was some "right to privacy" in the Constitution.


8 posted on 06/16/2006 2:36:56 PM PDT by Irish Rose (Will work for chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V.Foster; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan
Clinton said any president should have the latest technology to track terrorists, but within laws that provide for oversight by judges.

She just gave away the Commander in Chief Executive Power to the Legislators and Judges.

She's not fit to be President.

What a numbnutz!

9 posted on 06/16/2006 2:37:18 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
"Clinton wants to create a "privacy czar" within the White House"

SO will it be Craig Livingstone or Anthony Pellicano?

10 posted on 06/16/2006 2:37:27 PM PDT by BenLurkin ("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: V.Foster
Where are the voices that will remind her publicly about the FBI files etc.?
11 posted on 06/16/2006 2:38:32 PM PDT by The Brush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

yep.. little ferret wanted Nixon be denied his Constitutional rights.


12 posted on 06/16/2006 2:38:36 PM PDT by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: V.Foster

There would be less privacy problems if people were a bit more careful with what information they continue to give away.


13 posted on 06/16/2006 2:40:06 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V.Foster
She also wants legislation to let consumers know what information companies are keeping about them and how it is used, and create a tiered system of penalties for companies who are not careful with consumer data

Translation: She doesn't want companies coughing up data to the Feds, especially telecoms who can point to the bill her hubby signed to cover their rears.

Bet al Qaeda just loves that part. Way to go, Hillie.

14 posted on 06/16/2006 2:41:23 PM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V.Foster

It's way too late!


15 posted on 06/16/2006 2:41:50 PM PDT by Beckwith (The liberal media has picked sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irish Rose

Yeah, I guess Hillary is admitting that there is no right to privacy in the Constitution.


16 posted on 06/16/2006 2:42:37 PM PDT by Kenny Bunkport (Left's reaction to "GODLESS": "They haven't hated a book this much since the Bible." (pissant))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: V.Foster

Don't forget she has a trail coming up with Peter Paul.....

I bet she wants a privacy act.....I think she best leave the U.S. and forget to ever come back....


17 posted on 06/16/2006 2:45:46 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 (My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V.Foster

Don't forget she has a trail coming up with Peter Paul.....

I bet she wants a privacy act.....I think she best leave the U.S. and forget to ever come back....


18 posted on 06/16/2006 2:45:53 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 (My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V.Foster
The privacy rights WILL NOT EXTEND to the stolen FBI files
or the other files kept by Ms. Sose.


"WELCOME TO THE REAL AMERICA WHERE [Democratic Party] CRIMINALS GET TO BE
CELEBRITIES AND [Democratic Party] CELEBRITIES GET AWAY WITH MURDER
[and stolen FBI files and stolen National Archive Documents]."
"TO DIE FOR" Columbia Pictures



19 posted on 06/16/2006 2:48:33 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V.Foster

Craig Livingstone, Anthony Pellicano, FBI Files, this Arkansas Grifter really practices what she preaches!


20 posted on 06/16/2006 2:48:44 PM PDT by Cincinna (HILLARY & HER HINO WANT TO TAKE OVER YOUR COUNTRY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson