To: nw_arizona_granny; Quix; JockoManning; Velveeta; WestCoastGal; LucyT; Domestic Church; ...
2 posted on
06/16/2006 2:11:33 PM PDT by
DAVEY CROCKETT
(This is GOD'S COUNTRY!)
To: DAVEY CROCKETT
2020 The year that Islam is targeting for the overthrow of the American Judeo/Christian culture.
Islam - Convert or Die! Americas Call to Understanding.
If you respond to the growth of Islam in America by seeing a future landscape of religious tolerance where Christian churches dwell alongside Islamic mosques in brotherly peace and co-existence, you need to learn that truth about the growth and influence of Islam around the world, and its plan for America. There is a plan afloat to end your religious heritage and change your religious beliefs and loyalties at the point of a sword.
If the Islamic plan comes fully to America, Jewish worshipers will not go to Synagogue on Sabbath or openly celebrate Yom Kipper.
Christians will never again sit in church on Sunday mornings singing praises to Jesus the Savior Son of God. Never again hear the words of children singing Jesus loves me this I know. Never again see a Christmas manger scene or attend a Christmas choir concert, or enjoy an Easter morning service.
Youll praise the Muslim Allah or youll die
2020....it's not that far away folks.
11 posted on
06/16/2006 3:05:54 PM PDT by
patriot_wes
(Law of Unintended Consequences; Infant Baptism = an unbelieving, unsaved church.)
To: DAVEY CROCKETT
The experience of the Branch Davidians would indicate that religious enclaves are not easily maintained in the US.
52 posted on
06/16/2006 7:58:41 PM PDT by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: DAVEY CROCKETT
To: DAVEY CROCKETT
Christopher L. Eisgruber, professor of law at New York University, explained. He argued that, "the Constitution permits government to nurture ideological sub-communities founded upon premises inconsistent with the constitution's own commitments."[22] He maintained that such dissident sub-communities can provide important "sources of dissent"[23] and asserted that even if an enclave embraced ideals contrary to constitutional ideals, it should still be granted the right to pursue its own vision of good. For example, he wrote: [Though] it is regrettable that young women in Kiryas Joel [a Satmar Hasidic enclave] will grow up in a starkly sexist culture, and it is regrettable that the Amish children of Yoder will find it very hard to become astronomers or lawyers
it would also be regrettable if the United States were not home to any sub-communities which, like the Satmars or the Amish, rejected principles of justice fundamental to the American regime.[24] Last time I checked the Amish & Hasidic jews were not preaching hatred towards American citizens, endorsing the practice of beheadings or organizing suicide missions. I think we'd all be better off without the Islamic "vision of good".
To: DAVEY CROCKETT
This here's America, love it, embrace the freedom, meld into it. Accept our ways, laws, and language. If they are unable to achieve this, they should return to where they came from.
692 posted on
06/23/2006 3:46:41 AM PDT by
exnavy
(God bless America)
To: DAVEY CROCKETT
Such enclaves raise the fundamental questions of when, how, and to what extent religious practice may supersede the U.S. Constitution.
The United States is a democratic republic. It's citizens live under a constitution and a bill of rights. Period. End of story. No more to talk about.
If you want something else vote for it or vote in reps who agree with you. If you lose the vote accept it and make the best of it until the next vote. If you can't accept it the only alternative is to move to a country who has laws you agree with.
To: DAVEY CROCKETT
1,631 posted on
07/04/2006 1:18:42 AM PDT by
gakrak
("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
To: DAVEY CROCKETT
This is absurd. If one ethnic or religious or whatever group is allowed to isolate itself from American jurisprudence and establish its own enclave governed by its own laws, what is to stop any other group from doing the same? Can you imagine the chaos? Then what happens when you have the first honor killing? The first stoning or beheading? The first incidence of female mutilation? The first divorce leaving the woman without a means of support? You have a Tower of Babel with no governing authority.
2,047 posted on
07/10/2006 8:04:33 PM PDT by
ArmyTeach
(NOT ON MY WATCH!)
To: DAVEY CROCKETT
while the Little Rock enclave might prevent the sale of alcohol, can it punish possession and in what manner? Can it force all women, be they residents or visitors, to don Islamic hijab (headscarf)? Such enclaves raise the fundamental questions of when, how, and to what extent religious practice may supersede the U.S. Constitution.
No. No, no, no! A thousand times no!!!! If there is no enclave that caters to "Islamic" needs, then why not move to an islamic country?!?!
In the United States, religion and administration are seperate. It doesnt matter what your religion is! If someone turns up telling me that I have to keep a full length beard, and wear a turban when I pass through the Little Rock Islamic Park or whatever..... NO!
To: DAVEY CROCKETT
After reading this post, somehow the illegal aliens--most of which are Christian don't look so bad after all.
To: sauropod
To: DAVEY CROCKETT
"there was no community in the U.S. that showed the totality of the essential components of Muslim social, economic, and political structure."[2]
We have a constitution and a bill of rights that negate any need for the above. We have an economic system, legal system and we have a political structure. I suggest American Muslims practice their religion within the framework already established in this country and if they can't live with that then establish a political party, run members for office and/or influence congress to change laws that support their views.
To: DAVEY CROCKETT
The only thing that has changed about history, and it's a biggy, is WMD's. Islam has reared it's ugly head a few times in the past attempting to take over the world. This is merely a repeat of that attempt.
Islam is not the same as Judaism, or Christianity, in fact they are the 180 degree polar opposite. To Islam lying for allah is one of the greatest things an Islamic can do. In Judaism and Christianity the truth is one of the root foundations of their faith. The Truth is important to God, who has called Satan a liar from the beginning and therefore He says it is only natural that the children of Satan honor the lie and are themselves liars. This makes them very easy to identify. Especially when a Cleric calls Allah, "The greatest deceiver of them all".
Lying is part and parcel of the Islamic doctrine, there are too many instances to list of their pious lying. Therefore I find it laughable, naive, and dangerous, that these human rights groups defend and base their statements that Israel is deliberately attacking civilians on the testimony of Islamics.
To: DAVEY CROCKETT
They want Islamic rule, buy them a one way ticket to IRAN. These fascists are really becoming a pain in our A$$. If we give them an inch they will want the mile. I hope we squash this bull before we are sorry for making a big mistake. Amen.
3,574 posted on
07/28/2006 2:36:53 AM PDT by
gakrak
("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson