Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush declines to meet with border officials
San Bernardino Sun ^ | 06/16/2006 | Sara A. Carter

Posted on 06/16/2006 10:41:38 AM PDT by Small-L

President Bush has refused to meet with border law-enforcement officials from Texas for a second time. His response to their request came in the form of a letter Monday, angering both lawmakers and sheriffs.

In fact, some Republican members of the House, upset by what they call the administration's seeming lack of concern for border security, are preparing to hold investigative hearings in San Diego and Laredo, Texas, early next month.

Members of the House Subcommittee on International Terrorism and Nonproliferation hope to expose serious security flaws that could potentially lead to terrorist attacks in the country, said Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, who is a member of the panel and has pushed for the hearings.

"The next terrorist is not going to come in through (Transportation Security Administration) screening at Kennedy airport," Poe said. "We already have information that people from the Middle East have come through the border from Mexico. They assimilate in Mexico learning to speak Spanish and adopt customs and then they cross the border into the United States."

Poe requested the meeting for members of the Southwestern Sheriffs' Border Coalition a group that includes all 26 border-county sheriffs from California, New Mexico, Arizona and Texas. The sheriffs wanted to speak to the president about the increasing dangers in their communities and along the border.

"The president is the busiest man in the world but he needs to take the time to talk to the border sheriffs and learn what's happening in the real world from them," Poe said. "We can't understand why he refuses to meet with them."

In May, all of the Republican House members from Texas traveled to Washington to meet the president regarding border security. Bush did not meet with them, however, and former White House spokesman Scott McClellan was sent in his stead.

Poe said the White House letter dated Monday showed the disconnect between the administration and the American people who want the border secured.

"The president would appreciate the opportunity to visit with border sheriffs," said the White House letter written by La Rhonda M. Houston, deputy director of the Office of Appointments and Scheduling. "Regrettably, it will not be possible for us to arrange such a meeting. I know that you understand with the tremendous demands of the president's time, he must often miss special opportunities, as is the case this time."

Rick Glancey, spokesman for the sheriffs coalition, said its members are angry and disappointed in the president's response. Glancey said Bush's recent tour of the border with Border Patrol spokesmen did not reflect the reality of what locals live with every day.

"It's a slap in the face to the hardworking men and women on the front lines of rural America who every day engage in border-security issues," Glancey said. "He missed the opportunity to take off his White House cowboy boots and put some real cowboy boots on and walk in our shoes for a few minutes."

The border hearings will expose the truth to the American public and force the administration to take a serious look at the border, said Allan Knapp, Poe's legislative director.

Knapp and Poe have traveled twice to the border this year, spending time along barren stretches where they witnessed no security and numerous migrants crossing into the United States, they said.

"We need to expose the lack of border security before it is too late," Poe said. "We're fighting a war on terror in Iraq and we're winning, but we're losing our own border war. These hearings will be a necessary step in the right direction."

Andy Ramirez, chairman of the Chino-based Friends of the Border Patrol, said he has been called to testify before the panel in San Diego. Ramirez said he has turned in two years of Border Patrol documents and memos, which he will discuss before the committee.

"The president has basically pushed his whole administration's agenda toward the war on terror, yet he can't find the time to meet with law-enforcement leaders responsible for border security," Ramirez said. "It is appalling and outrageous that the war on terror and border security does not extend to the U.S. border."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; border; bordersecurity; bushamnesty; bushbash; bushbotrage; bushbotsindenial; cincbait; givingamericaaway; globalism; illegalaliens; illegalimmegration; immigrantlist; immigration; invasionusa; nafta; nau; northamericanunion; openborders; pitchforkers; singleissuevoters; spp; totalization; unappeaseables
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 621-627 next last
To: Arizona Carolyn

Thanks


181 posted on 06/16/2006 12:57:21 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

"Recall that TR only became president because the GOP leadership thought making him Vice President would push him out of the way."

Well, I'm not really THAT old. [grin]. Yes, it has happened, but not for a long time, now. Nixon was about the closest in recent years, and that didn't really work out all that well.

Reagan was a globalist, too. I just do not see a big change on the horizon. A true conservative cannot win the Presidency right now. Of that I'm certain. So, we're back to the middle. The guy with the smiling face, who tells us all that things will get better, that all problems will be solved, and that we'll have plenty of chickens to eat, will get elected. Thus has it been. Teddy R. was an old grump. Nixon frowned a lot and didn't serve out his term.

Ya gotta smile big to be President now.


182 posted on 06/16/2006 12:59:59 PM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Hey, he went down there and had a look at the border for himself

He went to Larado for 25 mins. and never left the airport. The words 'photo op' come to mind.


183 posted on 06/16/2006 1:00:23 PM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Small-L
"The president is the busiest man in the world but he needs to take the time to talk to the border sheriffs and learn what's happening in the real world from them," Poe said. "We can't understand why he refuses to meet with them."

The elected United States President Self appointed MexicAmerica President is a busy man and can't be bothered with peasants working against his Hemispheric government/trade agenda.

184 posted on 06/16/2006 1:00:34 PM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Then the Treaty of Guadalupe Hildalgo should mean something to you. Obviously it means nothing to Bush.
185 posted on 06/16/2006 1:00:39 PM PDT by tertiary01 (Soviet style debating tactics invented tinfoiling the opposition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

"He went to Larado for 25 mins. and never left the airport. The words 'photo op' come to mind.
"

Yes? Well? Photo ops are the way Presidents have done their jobs for many years now. I wouldn't expect too much more than that, were I you.


186 posted on 06/16/2006 1:01:50 PM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Crusher138
What makes you think I quoted this from You?

This was your Quote.

"If you are going to lie, do so someplace else."
187 posted on 06/16/2006 1:02:22 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

"MexicAmerica"

That should be MexiCanadAmerica. Don't leave out our neighbors to the north.


188 posted on 06/16/2006 1:03:55 PM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: tertiary01

"Then the Treaty of Guadalupe Hildalgo should mean something to you. Obviously it means nothing to Bush."

Indeed. Well, that's another Treaty to be overridden by another Treaty at some point. That's the deal with Treaties. A new one can override the old one. It's all Constitutional, you see. Go read the Constitution.


189 posted on 06/16/2006 1:05:00 PM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
That should be MexiCanadAmerica. Don't leave out our neighbors to the north.

You're right how foolish of me to forget he wants to be their leader as well.

190 posted on 06/16/2006 1:05:19 PM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

By now, most white Americans have been here long enough that several generations of ethnic intermarriage have largely severed our emotional attachment to any particular European country. But for the first generation or two, there were tightly-knit ethnic enclaves which still survive in attenuated form in some of the major cities. It's not reasonable to expect the most recent wave of Hispanics to assimilate in the first few years they are here, or to quickly sever their emotional ties to their former countries. Nor is it a new thing to hear of a radical political element among the new immigrants. So there are reasons to believe that there is nothing radically new about the current situation, other than that much of the immigration is illegal, primarily because of the geographical proximity of Mexico. But most of the other things that alarm anti-immigration people are just a continuation of what we had for much of our history.


191 posted on 06/16/2006 1:07:14 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

"You're right how foolish of me to forget he wants to be their leader as well.
"

No, he doesn't. George W. Bush will be on permanent retirement, starting in January, 2009. None of this will have come to pass by then.

He's going to head down to his ranch, put his feet up, and visit with folks who come to visit him there. He'll make a few speeches here and there, eat a lot of BBQ, and join the other former Presidents from time to time in dedicating something or another.

He'll mess around with creating his presidential library, clear cedar, catch a bass or two in his little pond, and enjoy his life.

He's not going to be in charge of anything.


192 posted on 06/16/2006 1:08:20 PM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Again, the American people will speak in November, then again in 2008. My expectation is that they will, as they have done for a long, long time, vote for moderates.

Unfortunately this will continue. "Compassionate Conservative" was just another way of saying "moderate".
193 posted on 06/16/2006 1:08:23 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

The one thing to remember is that the speed of communications has changed the world. Through the Internet and Websites like this one I can see someone (like a Pence) who is relatively unknown getting ground roots support for the nomination.


194 posted on 06/16/2006 1:09:50 PM PDT by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

One thing that Bush WON'T do in retirement is publicly criticize the actions of his successors, ala Carter (especially) and Clinton (to a lesser extent).


195 posted on 06/16/2006 1:10:27 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

"By now, most white Americans have been here long enough that several generations of ethnic intermarriage have largely severed our emotional attachment to any particular European country."

That's true, for the most part, although you'll see lots of heritage days celebrated in many cities.

Assimilation is always only a partial process. It's happening now with a number of immigrant groups. It seems slow, since it takes two or three generations to really work.

You're right, though.


196 posted on 06/16/2006 1:10:49 PM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

All those liberals who say Bush is a far-right wacko should come in here and see how much Bush-bashing is going on amongst conservatives.


197 posted on 06/16/2006 1:11:51 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

"One thing that Bush WON'T do in retirement is publicly criticize the actions of his successors, ala Carter (especially) and Clinton (to a lesser extent)."

I expect you're right about that. I do not expect George W. Bush to be very active as an elder statesman. I doubt we'll hear much at all from him after January 2009.


198 posted on 06/16/2006 1:12:17 PM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
He's not going to be in charge of anything.

Yea but you forgot realitives who will reap Bush family fortunes in his trade deals. Which goes back to my tag line. I didn't like the Clinton Hillary's} family involved in foreign trade and I don't like da Bush's doing so either.

199 posted on 06/16/2006 1:13:29 PM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

One basic difference from history (versus the European immigration). Never in U.S. history has such a large group come from a single foreign country in so short a period.


200 posted on 06/16/2006 1:13:31 PM PDT by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 621-627 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson