Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT
"Or, to be more pointed, it is clear that they assume there should be skulls, and are therefore surprised not to find them. And skulls are kind of unique bone structures that you couldn't easily confuse for other things.

How many organisms that have wings and feathers but no heads do you know?

"So, given they must have worked really hard to find the skull bones that they were certain would be there, why don't you see that, for bones that are easily mistaken, they would have "found" the bones to be exactly what they were looking for them to be?

Which bones would that be? I see nowhere in the news blurb that out of 5 specimens only a few hard to identify (or easily mistaken) bones were found.

"You will find what you are looking for. When you know what the results are you need, there are many examples of otherwise good scientists who manage to FIND those results, whether they are correct or not. Just human nature.

Then again many finds are completely by accident and many that are found where expected to be found are unmistakable.

"Maybe the early human hunters collected their heads.

"Oh wait, there couldn't be humans there, this is before "65 million years ago" when we all KNOW that a cataclysmic event made all those pesky creatures we can't explain disappear.

That cataclysmic event, one of many such events, did not kill off all species. Both birds and mammals faired much better than the reptiles.

"I loved how they brought that back in with their "we just don't know yet" how these early ducks managed to survive that event to evolve into modern ducks.

How is not knowing how the event happened equivalent to not knowing that it happened?

"Maybe Noahzoa put them on his ark.

Who?

35 posted on 06/15/2006 1:07:13 PM PDT by b_sharp (There is always one more mess to clean up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: b_sharp
How many organisms that have wings and feathers but no heads do you know?

I think he thinks paleontologists work like Calvin where he and Hobbes put together a fossilized dinosaur out of plastic cups, plates, and utensils. Sure, they look like wings and feathers, but are they really?

46 posted on 06/15/2006 1:31:11 PM PDT by ahayes ("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: b_sharp
How many organisms that have wings and feathers but no heads do you know?

Just the one.

55 posted on 06/15/2006 1:51:49 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: b_sharp
How many organisms that have wings and feathers but no heads do you know?

I don't know about wings and feathers, but you could start with the example of diplocaudus (tails on each end). ;-)

Cheers!

109 posted on 06/15/2006 8:35:53 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: b_sharp
How many organisms that have wings and feathers but no heads do you know?

I don't know about wings and feathers, but you could start with the example of diplocaudus (tails on each end). ;-)

Cheers!

110 posted on 06/15/2006 8:36:12 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson