Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FENCE-SITTING HILL 'LEFT' BEHIND ON THE WAR
NY Post ^ | 6/15/06 | Deborah Orin

Posted on 06/15/2006 4:01:54 AM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Shrillary's biggest problem isn't the Democratic primary or the antiwar nitwits. What will doom her is that when real campaigning starts she will have to put forth a position, stick with it and defend it in a non stage-managed environment. She won't be able to throw a bomb like she did against Ann Coulter then go run and hide, refusing to acknowledge the comeback that slapped her good.
1 posted on 06/15/2006 4:01:55 AM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

30 to 26 points behind the Breck girl--that's pretty bad.


2 posted on 06/15/2006 4:06:22 AM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom
Hillary's "Sistah Souljah" moment?

The problem is for her is that the radicals are the ones who make up the vast majority of the democrat party. They seem to want to be honest about their radicalness, instead of the clinton deception of apprering moderate.

3 posted on 06/15/2006 4:06:47 AM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

I believe you are talking about this war:

http://www.clermontyellow.accountsupport.com/flash/UntilThen.swf


4 posted on 06/15/2006 4:09:29 AM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom
Clinton's problem is that if she loses the first-in-the-nation Iowa caucuses, and possibly even if she just scrapes out a narrow win, that would likely kill her White House dreams.

"Aw, gee. Dat's tuff."

5 posted on 06/15/2006 4:11:55 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch (No.... wire .... hangers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom
She won't be able to throw a bomb like she did against Ann Coulter then go run and hide, refusing to acknowledge the comeback that slapped her good.

But, boy, she's gonna try, isn't she?

6 posted on 06/15/2006 4:13:28 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch (No.... wire .... hangers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

She's counting on the MSM to do the work for her.


7 posted on 06/15/2006 4:15:30 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

Let's be fair though. By 2007, Iraq will be in very, very good shape and the shrill anti-war 'we're losing' idiots will look stupid to the majority of voters.


8 posted on 06/15/2006 4:16:27 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
But, boy, she's gonna try, isn't she?

Maybe not! It just occurred to me after listening to Rush say how much the Clinton's love money that Hitlery might just be raising ton's of $$$, in a giant ruse, when she really plans on quitting and keeping it all. She could raise 50 million dollars and then make up some phony reason just to retire from politics, keeping all the dough.

9 posted on 06/15/2006 4:19:15 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dane
They seem to want to be honest about their radicalness, instead of the clinton deception of apprering moderate.

Which is why all the articles about the Democrats wanting a return of the Clinton 90's is nonsense.

The Democrat base wants a return to the 1960's radicalism that cost them the White House in 1968.

10 posted on 06/15/2006 4:24:24 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
I continue to believe that she won't make it past the primaries.

Even though the media fawns all over her, most Americans can't stand the thought of her running anything. I live in a very liberal town, and most folks that I know, who are liberal, will not vote for her at all.

11 posted on 06/15/2006 4:27:47 AM PDT by Northern Yankee ( Stay The Course!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
Let's be fair though. By 2007, Iraq will be in very, very good shapeand the shrill anti-war 'we're losing' idiots will look stupid to the majority of voters.

You don't need to wait to 2007 the anti-war losers are looking quite daft right now to the majority!

12 posted on 06/15/2006 4:30:56 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Words Mean Things...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

Doris Kearns Goodwin said on the Imus show that a friend told her that Hillary should wait 10 years before running for President because (I am not making this up) she had too much sex appeal to be elected.


13 posted on 06/15/2006 4:33:16 AM PDT by BadAndy ("Loud mouth internet Rambo")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BadAndy
she had too much sex appeal to be elected.

excuse me while I clean up all the pepsi I just blew through my nose laughing hysterically

14 posted on 06/15/2006 4:42:11 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

By the way--Do we still have Bubba deployed troops in Bosnia, etc?

Have they all come home yet? Do we know the timetable for when they will come home. Should Bubba have brought them all home before he left office?

If there are any there, some non-MSM reporter needs to press Hillary and Bill to answer on wheen they should have or now should come home.


15 posted on 06/15/2006 4:43:33 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BadAndy
Sharon Stone also said the hildebeast had too much sex appeal to be elected.

Liberals are truly dilusional!

16 posted on 06/15/2006 4:45:32 AM PDT by newfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

Her position on the war on terror is typically worthless Clinton triangulation bullsh*t. Don't commit to either side, see how the chips fall, then take credit in the end whatever the outcome.

But above all -- do nothing, stand for nothing.

That's the reason she and her husband are hated. Phony, phony, phony... and not just for Republicans anymore.


17 posted on 06/15/2006 4:58:27 AM PDT by Jhensy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

Personnally I cant see how John Edwards qualifies in any way for the Presidency. He made a fortune bilking insurance companies, spent 4 years in the Senate and then went campaigning for the Vice presidency. Whta bills did he sponsor what has he done in govt., what does he know about foreign policy. Spending 6 years as a Jr. Senatorm is no qualification to be President. He is nothing more than a pretty face and a slick hairdo.


18 posted on 06/15/2006 5:05:30 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwa265
>>I believe you are talking about this war

That is a wonderful slideshow.

Made me cry. And then, pray.

Thank you!
19 posted on 06/15/2006 5:11:30 AM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

Imagine that HUGE butt hanging over a fence... Pretty disgusting.


20 posted on 06/15/2006 5:19:27 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson