[E. Pluribus Unum]

Thus, I think you have erroneously confused policy with motive.

I get it.

You have policies, people who disagree with you have agendas.

How Democrat of you.

[PubliusToo]

I seem to recall that not I, but you, had either ignored or summarily dismissed the qualified reputable scientists who support with my "faith-based" opinion. An opinion, I should add, that literally was no opinion at all, but an expression of uncertainty. And because I asserted that those supporting policy changes to address global warming were doing so based on the opinions of reputable qualified scientists, you concluded, again without any apparent basis or logic, that "[I] have policies, people who disagree with [me] have agendas."

Rather than trade insults, I will leave you with this appropriate quotation: “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; second, it is violently opposed; and third, it is accepted as self-evident.” Arthur Schopenhauer