[wagglebee]

Pacifists are often personally sweet and endearing people who advocate "peace," and therefore their doctrine is usually spared the moral contempt it merits. Among its many moral and intellectual weaknesses, pacifism ensures that cruelty will prevail on earth.

Pacifism will NEVER produce peace, it will only allow for more barbarian totalitarianism.

[calcowgirl]

If the fact that a man who regards his son's butcher as a better man than the American president is rewarded with a party's nomination to Congress does not tell you all you need to know about the morally twisted world of the Greens, nothing will.

BUMP!

[Gordongekko909]

There was a speech in Team America: World Police that explained this truth perfectly. But seeing as how I like my account and don't want it to get banninated, I can't reprint it here.

[Gordongekko909]

But on another note, as long as the Greens keep sucking votes away from the Dems and never become politically viable themselves, they still have my "support."

[small voice in the wilderness]

..yet another soloist in the liberal hallelujah choir. And not a moment too soon. He pipes in with his part just as Ann Coulter starts the rounds to prove her points. Sing it, Berg. Sing it loud. Until Americans find their ears bleeding. And finally say "enough".

[wmileo]

Any state that could send Joe Biden to Washington is capable of anything.

[ladyinred]

Actually, the parent of a person murdered by terrorists who support the war and the President get no attention! The press adores those who trash the President.

[marron]

Berg believes George W. Bush is more evil than Zarqawi.

Given the choice between the man who butchered his son, and the man who stopped the man who butchered his son, Berg chooses the butcher.

Pacifists in general are not in any way admirable people, they are very often fascists without the courage to declare themselves, their moral outrage is almost always reserved for the people who would stand up to evil. Pacifists as a general rule always side with evil.

If you ever find yourself in a serious struggle with a dangerous foe, not only will a pacifist not help you, you will discover that his sympathies are with the biggest and the baddest, and not with you. You shame him by your willingness to act, and to risk yourself in a fight. He will never forgive you for that.

But Berg is in a class by himself. He is a moral imbecile.

[prophetic]

George Bush sits there glassy-eyed in his office with pieces of paper and condemns people to death. That to me is a real terrorist."

Obviously Mr Berg knows NOTHING about the responsibilities of being Commander In Chief or anything remotely connected to real responsibility esp in time of WAR!

[doug from upland]

Berg gets a mention on eBay --- http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6637592440

[Navy Patriot]

I believe that a good father trains his children to protect themselves. Even pacifists can make their children aware of danger and ways to avoid it without violating their principles. I believe that Nick Berg got more indoctrination than education from Michael, and he needed the reverse. Rest in peace, Nick.

[Doctor Raoul]

Berg is NOT a pacifist! He's a Socialist Worker's Party Kool Aide drinker.

Here's INDCJournal's account of him admitting he was active in the SWP with his other son:

June 07, 2004
INDC Journal Interviews Michael Berg (Best Of)
http://www.indcjournal.com/archives/000485.php

EXCERPT:
Michael Berg: "Who are you?"

Socialist Workers Party Reporter: "I’m with the Socialist Workers newspaper."

Michael Berg: "Socialist Workers newspaper?
(Enthusiastically) Oh, yeah , oh yeah, oh yeah … (gives
info) my e-mail is the best way to contact, because my
wife probably will slam down the phone on just about
anyone who calls; she’s still in a very emotional
state. My son was a member of the Socialist Workers
Party, yes he was, my son David, not my son Nick, my
older son David. I supported his efforts working with
the Socialist Workers Party, and I went with him to the
headquarters in NY and I attended the rallies and I
supported his trips to Cuba and … I don’t really want
to say (gestures to me) because he’s (got a tape recorder)."

What was he afraid to say? Was it incriminating, or is Mr.
Berg merely aware that his utility and mainstream image
as an antiwar advocate would be tarnished by close
association with a Communist political group?

[Free ThinkerNY]

[vox_freedom]

I listened to Mr. Berg on Michael Medved's radio show. Berg felt that appropriate punishment for al-Zarqawi in the killing of (Berg's) son was to work in a hospital with injured children. Something about restorative punishment or justice.

Mr. Berg is a poor, misguided soul. Pacifism in the face of evil attacks, only brings about more evil. Not taking appropriate action exposes the most weak in society to harm, assault and even death.

If Mr. Berg doesn't wish to push back on barbarians, and defend the innocents, the least he should do is step aside and get out of the way so that others can do the right thing.

[I still care]

"At some point, one would think, is there a moment when you say, 'I'm glad he's dead, the man who killed my son'?" Berg responded: "No. How can a human being be glad that another human being is dead?"

When the human being in question is a vile evil piece of ***.

When you lose the capacity to recognize evil and expunge it, history will run you over and throw you away.

[PzLdr]

Si vis pacem, para bellum.

[CFC__VRWC]

Has anyone seen any polling for the Delaware House race? I'll bet Berg got a bump in the polls after his comments about President Bush and Zarqawi, and that was probably the main reason he made them in the first place.