Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FUD-EP
"Attacking 9/11 widows? Come on!"

Liberal talking point. She didn't attack 9/11 widows. She attacked four specific individual liberal talking heads that happen to be 9/11 widows. There is a difference.

"She's a media whore who makes her money making conservatives appear unreasonable. That's exactly why the msm gives her so much attention."

She makes excellent points attacking liberals, sending them into a frenzy and she makes money in the process. Is this a great country or what. But you still have not explained how she is working for liberals.

" When was the last time you saw someone thoughtful (George Will, Krauthammer, Buckley, ect) on some low grade cable shout-fest?"

I'm not sure I've seen Ann in a "shout fest" that wasn't instigated by a liberal. She is usually calm and thoughtful before responding to an interviewer. However, when she is being assaulted by liberals, she will raise her voice to make herself heard. In your own words...

"There is a reason for that."

She drives liberals crazy. So... how does she work for liberals?

457 posted on 06/13/2006 9:58:52 PM PDT by DocRock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies ]


To: DocRock

"She drives liberals crazy. So... how does she work for liberals?"

Because she inspires them. Because they LOVE to hate her.

I'll just end this back and forth by saying that as a libertarian conservative (but apparently full of "liberal talking points"), I find her tasteless, thoughtless, and a total huckster. The Michael Moore of the right.


459 posted on 06/13/2006 10:10:59 PM PDT by FUD-EP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson