Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

From God to Godless: The Real Liberal Terror
American Spectator ^ | June 12 2006 | Jeffery Lord

Posted on 06/11/2006 9:42:01 PM PDT by Reagan Man

The book reviewers were absolutely hostile, enraged at what they read.

"The book is one which has the glow and appeal of a fiery cross on a hillside at night. There will undoubtedly be robed figures who gather to it, but the hoods will not be academic. They will cover the face," snarled one, ominously comparing it to a work of the Ku Klux Klan. "This fascist thesis," angrily spluttered another, "...This...pure fascism....What more could Hitler, Mussolini, or Stalin ask for...?" Still others piled on. The book was dismissed as a series of "fanatically emotional attacks" that "succeeded in turning the stomachs of its readers." The author drew howls of outrage, the lesser of which focused on adjectives like "rude" and "obnoxious" before descending into cries of "fascist."

The name of the book was not Godless. And the author was not Ann Coulter. The book that drew such ferocious attention was God and Man at Yale. The author, a recent Yale graduate, was a precocious William F. Buckley, Jr.

God and Man at Yale, published in 1951, was a then-startling protest about the liberal bias of a major university, in this case Buckley's alma mater.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: buckley; liberalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: CyberAnt
"... the dems are using a 30 yr old playbook."

30 years? How old is the communist manifesto. They think they have updated it, but, alas, to no avail. The Third Way

yitbos

21 posted on 06/11/2006 11:58:10 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Oh so true.


22 posted on 06/12/2006 12:11:45 AM PDT by jeremiah (How much did we get for that rope?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Klansmen are probably macroevolutionists (or of some pseudoCreationist variety).


23 posted on 06/12/2006 1:53:47 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu (www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

R.I.P. ya S.O.Bs


24 posted on 06/12/2006 1:58:18 AM PDT by wildcatf4f3 (Islam Schmislam blahblahblah, enough already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

You are absolutely correct. Sometimes it takes going "overboard" to really get people's attention. Buckley certainly has that ability.


25 posted on 06/12/2006 1:58:27 AM PDT by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Listen up everybody. You MUST read the entire article.


26 posted on 06/12/2006 2:25:04 AM PDT by jslade (Liberalism ALWAYS accomplishes the exact opposite of it's stated intent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe; Huck; blue-duncan; Reagan Man
I'm reading Mr. Buckley for the first time: just picked up a copy of The Jeweler's Eye. Ann Coulter so obviously found her 'voice' in William Buckley's; the tone and cadence between the two are so similar, and she comes as close as a mere mortal can to his vocabulary. Mr. Buckley was certainly a prophet in much that he wrote - on Reagan, for instance, before he was even governor of California, and in his projection that one day we all might cast our vote via telephone line (see The Twenty-fourth Amendment, February 18, 1964).

Buckley is so highly quotable! In his article What is Conservatism, October, 1963, he discusses the various branches of our sect by our singular desires and draws a highly rational and also humorous conclusion (his trademark, which Ann Coulter has by God's grace adopted):

Many right-wingers (and many liberals, and all Communists) believe in a deus ex machina. Only introduce the single tax, and our problems will wither away, say the followers of Henry George....Only expose the Jew, and the international conspiracy will be broken, say others....Only abolish the income tax, and all will be well....Forget everything else, but restore the gold standard....Abolish compulsory taxation, and we all shall be free....They are called nostrum peddlers by some; certainly they are obsessed. Because whatever virtue there is in what they call for - and some of their proposals strike me as highly desirable, others as mischievous - no one of them can begin to do the whole job, which continues to wait on the successful completion of the objectives of the Committee to Abolish Original Sin.

27 posted on 06/12/2006 2:31:27 AM PDT by .30Carbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

"I will prefer an athiest conservative over a religious liberal any day. "

I know what you mean. Arianna Falacci makes tons more sense than any Democrat in existence. She is said to be an atheist.


28 posted on 06/12/2006 4:51:47 AM PDT by RoadTest (“Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil” –Thomas Mann)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Absolutely fantastic; thanks for posting this!


29 posted on 06/12/2006 4:57:21 AM PDT by alwaysconservative (Tarp as a shack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alwaysconservative; kstewskis; Victoria Delsoul; Kelly_2000; Raquel

Great read!


30 posted on 06/12/2006 5:09:29 AM PDT by Northern Yankee ( Stay The Course!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
From academia to politics to religion, the media and the law, the liberal Humpty Dumpty has fallen from its once dominant perch. No matter how hard they try, liberals will never be able to put it back together again.

Spot-on analysis. This is a great, must-read article. Imagine what might have happened forty-fifty years ago had the lunatic lefties not had a stranglehold on information to the public? Thanks to Al Gore's internet, the left's monopoly on the media is no more.

31 posted on 06/12/2006 5:23:10 AM PDT by shezza (God bless our military heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
CBS News solemnly reported the week of his nomination that Goldwater's first act after the convention would be to travel to Germany for a visit to "Berchtesgaden, Hitler's one-time stamping ground." And what will the conservative Goldwater do once there? "There are signs," CBS reporter Daniel Schorr said ominously, "that the American and German right wings are joining up..." Got that? Barry Goldwater, said CBS in so many words, was really a Nazi. With a presidential nomination in hand, he was literally heading to Hitler's home to get the international Nazi movement rolling. The story, from the trip to Germany to the visit to Hitler's estate was, of course, false from beginning to end.

I had never read about that. Interesting.

I do take issue that FoxNews is a conservative channel, clearly it is not. In fact, we watch hardly anything except Brit anymore due to the increase in liberal perspective we see there.

32 posted on 06/12/2006 5:56:51 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (“Double or triple our troubles and we would still be better off than any people on earth.”---Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: CyberAnt

He is right.


34 posted on 06/12/2006 6:05:04 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
To which religion must a conservative subscribe?

Why, the exact same one, to every jot and tittle, as JCEccles, silly boy.

35 posted on 06/12/2006 6:06:51 AM PDT by steve-b (Hoover Dam is every bit as "natural" as a beaver dam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: larryp2007
My own preference is for those who can spell "atheist" correctly.

I'm very sorry, but you have to be here over 24 hours to have a preference. Those are the rules.

36 posted on 06/12/2006 6:07:41 AM PDT by Coop (FR= a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: .30Carbine

Excellent passage..


37 posted on 06/12/2006 6:36:24 AM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
[ The first is a fraud, the second a farce. ]

Good line.. good sound bite..

38 posted on 06/12/2006 6:53:30 AM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Well .. my statement was taken from Rush's statement that the dems continue to use their same playbook from 30 years ago.


39 posted on 06/12/2006 7:43:43 AM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: shezza; Northern Yankee; Victoria Delsoul
Imagine what might have happened forty-fifty years ago had the lunatic lefties not had a stranglehold on information to the public? Thanks to Al Gore's internet, the left's monopoly on the media is no more.

Isn't kind of amusing, how every time the left "invents" something, it somehow backfires into their collective faces?

40 posted on 06/12/2006 9:23:22 AM PDT by kstewskis ("Aim small, miss small...." Benjamin Martin to Nathan and Samuel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson