If you had given your opinion after you had read the entire book, your opinion might bear consideration. However, when you voice a negative opinion of a book you have not even bothered to read, it reveals you to be nothing but the typical feeble minded liberal.
I've gone through of than more than 75% of the rag and find it not worth finishing.... Misrepresentation of my previous post is unseemly and, if it's the best you can to to defend her book--by attempting to shift the focus to me, it's not much of an endorsement...It was a complete waste of whatever my wife spent on it; money that could have been better spent by giving it to the USO.
And isn't it the libs who always complain when conservatives, especially religious conservatives, come out against books without reading them first?