[familyop]

BTW, you'll see many omissions and obfuscations from the British press on the issue in the days to come.

[singfreedom]

Mr. Brown, you will notice, was very careful to "side step" any possible notion that "middle America" might have REASONS not to support the UN. Just an observation.

[vimto]

Well there is a lot of anti- us sentiment over here pushed mostly by the Independent and other MSM, but note a very supportive Times editorial the other day.

Yet at the moment it seems most papers are with the USA on this one - it is 'unBritish' to talk openly like this (even if he thought it).

There is also a lot of suspicion of the 'UN' over here, so most people would see it as the pot calling the kettle black.

I understand the US has threatened to withhold UN funds over this. Good on you. The UN is anti-American and has got away with the bias far too long.

kind regards

[MadIvan]

BTW, you'll see many omissions and obfuscations from the British press on the issue in the days to come.

There isn't a story that could potentially damage relations between Britain and America that you won't post.

In fact, you'll go through the trouble of posting the same story, from different sources, just to drive that particular nail home.

As such, I think everyone here is entitled to know that you have an agenda. It's a stupid, pointless agenda to try and turn the good people here against their chief ally in the War on Terror.

Ivan