Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NJ assemblywomen call for boycott of new Coulter book
Phillyburbs/AP ^ | 6/8/06 | staff

Posted on 06/08/2006 12:38:21 PM PDT by pissant

TRENTON, N.J. - Commentator Ann Coulter's incendiary words about outspoken 9/11 widows have led two state lawmakers to calls for a boycott of her book in the widows' home state of New Jersey.

Assemblywomen Joan M. Quigley, D-Hudson, and Linda Stender, D-Union, on Thursday called on New Jerseyans to stop buying the book, "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," and for retailers in the state to stop selling it.

"Coulter's vicious characterizations and remarks are motivated by greed and her desire to sell books. By making these claims, she proved herself worse than those she is attempting to vilify - she is a leach trying to turn a profit off perverting the suffering of others," the two assemblywomen said in a statement.

A spokeswoman for Crown Forum, the publisher of Coulter's book, did not immediately return calls for comment Thursday.

In her new book, Coulter writes that a group of New Jersey widows whose husbands perished in the World Trade Center act "as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them."

She also wrote, "I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much."

The comments drew criticism Wednesday from Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., who said the book should be called "Heartless," and New York's Republican Gov. George Pataki, who said he was stunned by the remarks.

Coulter appeared Tuesday on NBC's "Today" show and stuck by her stance, saying the women used their grief "to make a political point."

Her criticism was aimed at four New Jersey women she dubbed "The Witches of East Brunswick," after the town where two of them live.

The women - Kristen Breitweiser, Lorie Van Auken, Mindy Kleinberg and Patty Casazza - have spent the years since the 2001 terror attacks supporting an independent commission to examine government failures before the attack. During the 2004 presidential race, they endorsed Democrat John Kerry.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: byrne; cacklinghen; corzine; florio; gardenstate; iamagayamerican; joanquigley; kean; lindastender; mcgreevey; newjersey; nj; quigley; sopranos; stender; thesopranos; whatexitareyou; whitman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 541-543 next last
To: jebeier
Perhaps they should have thought about that before they agreed to become shills of the anti-war Left. They have said the most vicious things about President Bush, including repeating the slander that he allowed 9/11 to happen for his own purposes.

Well stated. I agree.

Once you cross a line like that, you're fair game. If you don't want your children to hear nasty things about you in the press, don't cross that line.

Well stated. I agree.

But this business of the Left using spokesmen who cannot be countered because they are "untouchable" has to end.

Well stated. I agree.

81 posted on 06/08/2006 1:10:48 PM PDT by Skooz (Chastity prays for me, piety sings...Modesty hides my thighs in her wings...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Coulter is Coulter. Not for those folks who are easily offended by over the top hyperbole. As far as I'm concerned, once they start spouting like moonbats in the political arena, they are fair game for derision.

Hugh Hewitt has never been a Coulter fan, and those who have read and enjoyed her wit, are not likely to see this as over the line. When she said "let's invade their countries and convert them to Christianity", the polite class gasped in horror. Ann's fans cheered her on.

I don't whine when people hammer Nancy Pelosi's looks, Michael Moore's treason, or for that matter Coulter being a desparate transvestite.

We need someone on our side who will fight in the gutter with the gutter-dwelling, treasonous libs and spit in their face. Ann's the one.


82 posted on 06/08/2006 1:10:54 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Placing what she actually said in its context is precisely what Breitweiser, these assemblywomen, Hewitt and Peach do not want you to do.

I'm still waiting for that context you think the writing should have been placed in. tick tock

83 posted on 06/08/2006 1:11:06 PM PDT by Peach (If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I wouldn't be suprised if Laura and Hugh were in on it.

This is good stuff when looked at in the context of the entire nation now will get to see what Liberals really are.

It was extreme and served a purpose. Was the foreword to the book written by Karl Rove?


84 posted on 06/08/2006 1:11:10 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Democrats - The reason we need term limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

Like I said, like a fiddle. LOL


85 posted on 06/08/2006 1:11:18 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: glorgau
"Don't they realize this?"

Naw, the concept is too close to Capitalism and Supply & Demand. Never.

86 posted on 06/08/2006 1:11:35 PM PDT by rvoitier ("And if talk is cheap anywhere, perhaps it is cheapest, quite frankly, in the Congress." Vitter(R-La)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

Why do you have to attack the entire state of New Jersey ?


87 posted on 06/08/2006 1:12:57 PM PDT by XRdsRev (The Democrat Party - Keeping Black folks on the "Plantation" since 1790)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: in hoc signo vinces

Ironic, huh?


88 posted on 06/08/2006 1:13:21 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Ann has no way of knowing if those things she said about the women and their husbands is true. You think that's okay to say? Then you'll just have to remind me how we're different from the left if we start lying and making stuff up about people.


89 posted on 06/08/2006 1:13:28 PM PDT by Peach (If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Which part of what she wrote about the women being glad their husbands were dead or that their husbands were about to divorce them do you think I did not place in context?

The actions of these women: the fact that they clearly revel in their celebrity status as widows, milking it to the hilt for their own pleasure.

The fact that while these women are able to natter endlessly about how great they themselves are, how wonderful John Kerry is, how evil the President is, they never really discuss their murdered husbands at all except in the most impersonal forms of reference. A rational person would wonder why these women have zero desire to memorialize their dead husbands and conclude that they exhibit zero esteem for the departed.

Lastly, since these women seem to enjoy mugging for the cameras so much it's pretty amusing to suggest that they do what so many insubstantial celebrities do to get back in the limelight - pose for Playboy.

90 posted on 06/08/2006 1:13:30 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: fhlh

A marketing genius.


91 posted on 06/08/2006 1:13:43 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jebeier
Coulter is practicing the time-honored technique of finding the biggest bully in a bar and punching him square in the nose. She'll be in for a heck of a fight, but people will give her some room at the bar.

This is the best analogy I've seen in a looooong time. Thank you for the smile on my face!

92 posted on 06/08/2006 1:14:00 PM PDT by RepRivFarm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I doubt that any liberals are going to buy the book anyway


93 posted on 06/08/2006 1:14:05 PM PDT by street_lawyer (Conservative Defender of the Faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freee-dame

"Too bad she didn't include your "the fruits of}. Not a word is being said about anything else in the book. The left will not read it, only argue about this over the top statement. The right will read it...preaching to the choir."

More importantly, moderates will read it to see what the fuss is about. Some will probably say, "ahhhh, now I get it."

This was brilliant. The left cannot hide from this. They are condemning someone, trying to curb her freedom of speech. Coulter is going to get more air time on this becuse the libs want blood. They will pull a Matt Louer and get eaten up.


94 posted on 06/08/2006 1:14:09 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Democrats - The reason we need term limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Peach
tick tock

Grow up already. And stop whining.

95 posted on 06/08/2006 1:14:12 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: jbstrick
Her comments may be disgusting, but can you tell us how they are not true?

How does she know that the husbands of these women were about to divorce them? How is that true?

For Coulter to go off the rails and make these kinds of accusations (no matter how opportunistic the Jersey Girls are) suggests that Ann is somehow jealous.

At least they had husbands and children, something Coulter can't seem to snag.

96 posted on 06/08/2006 1:14:20 PM PDT by sinkspur ( Don Cheech. Vito Corleone would like to meet you......Vito Corleone.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams_Lite

If it was not for her consistent "bridge too far" statements, her books wopuild be in the bargain bin with Hillary's and Bill's.


97 posted on 06/08/2006 1:14:52 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
True. I've long argued against allowing victims to dictate public policy. Apart from the fact that they are immune from criticism, their perspective is by definition emotional and one-sided. We need more rationality and principle and less emotion and victimology in our public discourse.
98 posted on 06/08/2006 1:15:37 PM PDT by Hoffa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Peach

"I was glad to read that Laura Ingraham and Hugh Hewitt have called Coulter's remarks disgusting..."

Not true Laura wasn't thrilled with the remarks, but I don't recall hearing the word "disgusting".

And the Jersey Girls should have thought about what their kids might hear before they opened their vile anti-American mouths. They absolutely have the right to say any mindless or evil things they want to say, but they must be prepared to deal with verbal challenges. Freedom of speech isn't just for them.


99 posted on 06/08/2006 1:15:47 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: evets

Thank you.


100 posted on 06/08/2006 1:16:08 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 541-543 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson