Translation: HE DIED SLOWLY AND IN AGONY WHILE SURROUNDED BY HIS GLOATING ENEMIES.
ROCKS
Posted on 06/08/2006 10:32:17 AM PDT by llevrok
This Pacific NW "drudge like" web page is doing a great job today of tracking the liberal response to Zarqawi's death.
Absolutly amazing (but not surprising)
Exactly, how about interviewing some overjoyed Iraqis in this successful operation?
Why Nick Berg's father? Why Richard clarke? Because the networks will spin this to a negative.
Berg is an American hater and so was his son. Nick Berg was a traitor, he was a lillie white in trianing. Berg went to Iraq to help the insirgency but Zarqawi beheaded him because he had no use for his son except for propaganda purposes. If im not mistaken Nick Berg was the first American beheaded by Zarqawi in Iraq.
"Inconsequential; the country is divided by sectarian hatred that will continue to foment violence
43%"
This justshows how much they are in denial on the effect of Zarqaqi and Al Queda in Iraq who's goal was to create a civil war, to create sectarian violence by bombing mosques, etc.. We killed him and his closest associates. This is is extremely consequential as far as the insurgency goes.
Their arguments are so baseless, short-sighted and idiotic "If we kill terrorists it will create more terrorists" Sooo then dont fight them and let them kill as many people as they want - great strategy!
"Trying for the "Brokeback Terrorist" look."
I see. He must have applied that just before being sodomized by the 500 lber. Nothing better than a terrorist dying with a feminine look on his face. Are they planning a pig roast for his funeral? If so, Dibs on a Rib.
Berg was the first beheaded but not the first kidnapped.
A Halliburton employee escaped his captors the week before.
The Abu Ghraib scandal was Zarqawi's excuse for killing Berg but he had already held Berg for nearly a month. He was a liability (especially because of the escape of the other American, who did try to inform our government about his captors' identity and location).
They say (whether they believe it or not) that he was just another cog and easily replaced.
Except as Donald Rumsfeld pointed out on Laura Ingraham this morning, he had the financial ties, he had bin laden's trust. They aren't easy shoes to step into.
How do you know that the replacement won't turn evidence over to the US and expose Bin Laden's whereabouts? Someone outed Zarqawi as it is. He will be replaced but it has to be someone they trust. And will there be an internal power struggle?
Reports are that Nick Berg supported the war.
Fact is that Nick Berg shared his email account with Zacarias Moussaoui. And that will forever taint any motive Nick Berg had for going to Iraq.
I don't feel ANY sorrow for Zarqawi's family. They have appeared on Al Jazeera to say that this is not unexpected. They expected him to be murdered.
They claim that they had severed ties with him but it sounds more like a security thing than because of disgust at what he was doing.
A brother called him a martyr and said he hopes that are reunited in heaven.
The man worshipped an antiChrist and sadistically killed innocents in the name of "God". He won't be in heaven.
Yahoo news: Berg: No good in al-Zarqawi's death
New York Times: A Leader Is Eliminated, but Insurgency Is Likely to Carry On
CNN: Amanpour: An important step, but not the end
Reuters: Zarqawi - a street thug turned militant
Reuters: Arabs split over Zarqawi - hero or ruthless killer?
MURTHA: "We cannot win this. It's a civil war."
I have news for Murtha. There was an insurgency in the Reconstruction South AFTER the Civil War. It was called the KKK.
So did we have a civil war immediately after the Civil War?
Also, there have been reports that some 17 other Z-man associates and hideouts were taken out right after we got him. Apparently a good number of his people and hideouts were being monitored in a tightening net, and we didn't want to disturb then prior to getting Z-man because we were looking for any sign of contact with the Z-man.
I imagine that they might have tightened their own security after a raid if we had swooped in on those other hideouts too soon.
Translation: HE DIED SLOWLY AND IN AGONY WHILE SURROUNDED BY HIS GLOATING ENEMIES.
The unhappiness continues here…
http://www.poe-news.com/forums/sfs.php?si=31&fi=000060982
DU is even funnier. Several posters in that nuthouse say that Zaq never existed at all, he was just an American military Pysops creation and that his death is being used to bolster Bush's numbers and bring up the stock market.
how about this one??
Re: You have to feel sorry for Republica
by: tha_2nd_wind 06/08/06 02:38 pm
Msg: 539121 of 539171
Cheny is already in charge
Bush is just a puppet
and not even a very good one
Bush is the worst speaker in US Presidential history
This is equivalent to a parasitic worm feeling sorry for its host.
You ask a very good question when you ask, "What is wrong with these people!? Are they deranged?" Surely, there is something wrong with them, something seriously wrong with them. Perhaps, faulty circuits in the brain or even genetic malformations of some sort. Since they so often take positions clearly contrary to logic, itself, I am more and more convinced that they really just can't help themselves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.