My right to keep what I earn is inherent. It is not "given" to me by my "representatives." Suggesting that someone with a minority point of view "write their congressman" is nothing more than a taunt, and you know it. Besides, I can easily turn this around on you: "society's representatives" in the form of one of the houses of Congress shot the amendment down, so maybe YOU should "write to them."
Subsidizing homosexual sex couplings will not help your cause -as such you too should support the FMA...
If it means continuing to subsidize heterosexual (or ANY) couplings at my expense, supporting it would likewise not advance my cause.
You appear to contradict yourself -I do not see you presenting a coherent ideology yet... Maybe I miss something -or maybe you just advocate for government free anarchy and as such whine about every government action?
See my tagline. That's basically my whole philosophy, from a legal perspective. It's also the Golden Rule. It seems to only cover personal issues, but supports economic freedom as well, in that no one is really victimized by people's refusal to turn over their earnings to others. Apart from that, I have no opinion on how others organize their own lives, because those lives are not mine to organize.
Is your tag line intentionally equal to "An it harm no one, do what thou wilt"?