Posted on 06/07/2006 6:39:05 AM PDT by Sabramerican
US compromises, will allow Iran to convert uranium Associated Press, THE JERUSALEM POST Jun. 7, 2006
World powers have compromised on a demand that Iran commit to a long-term moratorium on uranium enrichment and are asking only for suspension during talks on Teheran's nuclear program, diplomats said Wednesday.
In another concession, Iran would be allowed to carry out uranium conversion - a precursor to enrichment - if it agrees to multination talks, the diplomats said. They spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to divulge the contents of the offer made by six countries to Teheran Tuesday in a bid to defuse the Iranian nuclear standoff.
THE IRANIAN THREAT JPost.com special: news, opinion, blogs and more
Such changes to long-standing international demands on enrichment are important because they signal possible readiness to accept some limited form of the activity, despite fears that it can be misused to make the fissile core of nuclear warheads.
Since talks between key European nations and Iran broke off in August, the public stance by the European negotiators and the United States has been that Iran must commit to a long-term moratorium on enrichment to establish confidence as a precondition for talks on the nuclear standoff.
Diplomats have told the AP that Germany - which participated in drawing up the six-nation package of perks and punishments meant to ultimately persuade Iran to stop enriching uranium - has been advocating that Tehran be allowed such activity on a small scale.
Mohamed ElBaradei, the head of the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency, has backed that view, arguing that with Iran already successful in small-scale enrichment, it was unlikely to give up its right to such activities.
Iran announced April 11 that it had enriched uranium for the first time, using 164 centrifuges. Still, the country would need tens of thousands of centrifuges to produce adequate fuel for a nuclear reactor or material for a warhead, and those advocating that Iran be allowed to do research and development on enrichment say it is better to permit it an internationally supervised program on such a small scale and try to gain agreement from Tehran that it will not develop a large industrial program.
Iran has said it intends to move toward large-scale enrichment involving 3,000 centrifuges by late 2006 and 54,000 centrifuges later, but also has indicated it might suspend large-scale enrichment to ease tensions.
In an April report, ElBaradei said Iran's claim to have enriched small amounts to a level of 3.6 percent - fuel-grade uranium, as opposed to weapons-grade enriched to levels above 90 percent - appeared to be true.
The report also said uranium conversion - an activity linked to enrichment - "is still ongoing," adding that more than 110 metric tons - more than 120 US tons - have been converted over the past eight months. Were it used for weapons, that amount would be enough for more than 15 crude nuclear bombs, experts say.
A new report from ElBaradei ahead of next week's meeting of the IAEA's 35-nation board will be circulated to board members Thursday, agency officials said. One diplomat said it was unlikely to have major new revelations about Tehran's nuclear activities.
The Iran package was approved last week by the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France - the five permanent UN Security Council members - plus Germany.
It has not been made public but some of its contents have been leaked, revealing major concessions by the US meant to entice Iran to the negotiating table - among them an offer to join key European nations in providing some nuclear technology to Teheran if it stops enriching uranium, diplomats say.
A European offer of light water reactors meant for civilian nuclear energy purposes was divulged last month as part of the package, but there had been no suggestion the Americans would join in and agree to help build Iran's civilian nuclear program if Tehran freezes enrichment.
Providing additional details, a diplomat said Wednesday that under the package, Iran would be able to replenish its aging civilian fleet of aircraft not only with Boeing parts but also with new aircraft because the package dangles the prospect of lifting an embargo on such products if Iran comes to the negotiating table.
Washington broke with decades of official policy of no high-level diplomatic contacts with Tehran, announcing last week that it was ready to join talks with the Islamic republic over its nuclear program.
One diplomats described the US nuclear offer as particularly significant because it would in effect loosen a decades-long American embargo on giving Iran access to "dual use" technologies - equipment and know-how that has both civilian and military applications.
Diplomats said that in presenting the incentives to Iranian officials, top EU foreign policy official Javier Solana withheld the other part of the package - a series of measures meant to penalize Tehran if it does not relinquish enrichment.
Solana "carried a message" about potential penalties but withheld the specific threats _ including the possibility of UN sanctions _ so as not to jeopardize the "positive" atmosphere, one of the diplomats said.
Those possible penalties include UN Security Council sanctions such as travel bans on Iranian government officials and a freeze of their foreign assets. But in a bow to Russia and China, they contain no threat of military action, diplomats have said.
In Moscow, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Wednesday that his country would support sanctions only if Iran violates the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. It was unclear whether that meant Russia was backing away from its reported commitment for firm UN action if Tehran rejects the package.
President George W. Bush said Tuesday the United States will wait to see how Iran reacts to the package.
"I have said the United States will come and sit down at the table with them so long as they are willing to suspend their enrichment in a verifiable way," Bush said. "So it sounds like a positive response to me."
Now we are going to read how this is all a brilliant ploy.
It is brilliant. He's just going to prove 'One more time' that compromising with tyrants doesn't work.
Hey it worked for North Korea....Carter got the Nobel prize because of it....
That should read : US CAVES, will allow Iran to convert uranium
I'm not sure what could be done to stop them other than
having freepers post pictures of nuclear blasts.
Things appear to be cooling, only because of the U.S concessions. Now is the time to be really afraid.
Admittedly- this is startling and makes me very uneasy- yet it may just BE part of the strategy. "We did EVERYTHING we could to stop them"...
I'm willing to let it play out a bit before condemning it outright- though my gut reaction was WTH..
That could be it. But how many times do we have to prove it doesn't work ?
Imagine if Bill Clinton was the one making these deadly compromises with these neanderthals who openly promise to destroy us?
But since it is George Bush negotiating our destruction with the Iranians, well that makes it all just fine.
That's okay - if the Iranians try any funny stuff, they'll get the ol' - ouch! - UN sanctions. Hey, they brought Iraq to its knees, right?
(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")
See, here is the funny thing.
When I enthusiastically voted for Bush in 2004, I thought Kerry was the one who would bend himself out of shape to furnish such unneeded proof.
Seems Bush has adopted the Kerry's "Global Test" theory of foreign policy. And the Clinton approach of apology and surrender. He should pay Kerry and Clinton royalties.
Bush lacks the political clout for another Battle in the WOT...and watching how the media has ripped up the Iraq campaign, who could blame him for being trigger shy?
It would seem he's hesitant to send in troops to dismantle Iran...even though that's the right course of action, and I think he knows that would be the right thing to do. Unfortunately, it's not politically viable. Condi probably persuaded him against going in, because he would lack support internally and from our allies.
The Iranians know this. They know he (Bush) lacks support in congress to wage war against them, they know he lacks support in the media and the masses of sheep that drink from that group think slop trough, and that Europe is afraid of the Iranians and the crazies that would fight for that regime, and so the USA will capitulate...until Iran hits us, or an ally, and only then would it be incredibly clear that Iran must be destroyed for World Peace.
Sad thing to compromise...it's a precursor to the end of the middle east.
Bush is just over a barrel, and you can thank Murtha, Russert, Couric, NYT, CNN, and anyone else you can think of that's been an anti war liberal hack for endangering our lives.
Brilliant!
I would suggest that the next time (about 6 months from now) that we need to really, really prove that compromising with tyrants doesn't work, that we give Iran a Los Angeles-class submarine (so long as they promise not to use it).
Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel.
..................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.