Aside from your silly shouting, you have no idea what I have read about this. And your 'facts', unless they come from the lips of the Marines who were there, are not facts at all but suppositions.
I am not accepting any story, the media's or yours. I will wait to hear from the Marines. And if the Corps decides that there is no reason to take this public because they are satisfied that there is nothing there then that's good enough for me.
btw...your statement that, "The only witnesses were terrorists and/or terrorist sympathizers." is ridiculous...what about the Marines, doesn't their story count for you?
The Marines, thus far, are not talking--and when they do, they will be automatically discounted by their detractors--something you should have figured out by now. They will claim what the Marines say is "self-serving." One or two lawyers who say they represent them have said one or two things--and these statements would seem to absolve the Marines. But so far they are not going on the record.
What I stated in my post are facts we now know. The history of the doctor who did the forensics and the "journalist" are well documented.
The original poster should have added" The only Witnesses that have been quoted in the media. Although that wouldn't be quite right. There was a Marine who had taken photos after the fact, but wasn't there, and another who was there, but unconscious most of the time after the IED explosion, until well after he was evacuated for medical care.