Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mural celebrating Revolutionary War called too violent for Greenwich pupils
Waterbury Republican-American ^ | June 6, 2006 | Associated Press

Posted on 06/06/2006 8:26:34 PM PDT by Graybeard58

GREENWICH -- A restored Revolutionary War mural painted in the 1930s may not be returned to an elementary school because officials are concerned it is too violent for children.

The mural shows Gen. Israel Putnam, a war hero from Greenwich who fought at the Battle of Bunker Hill, half-naked and about to be burned at the stake.

He aims a gun at wolves while men around him fight with guns and knives.

"Violence is not something you see at Hamilton Avenue School," said principal Damaris Rau. "And then to have it in the forefront, especially in the lobby, a picture of men hurting each other and killing each other, it really goes against my sense of what children should be exposed to."

The mural, which belongs to the town and once hung in Town Hall, was commissioned by the Works Progress Administration in 1935 and painted by James Daugherty of Weston. It was displayed in the gym at Hamilton Avenue school for nearly 60 years until it was removed in 1998 and restored.

It now hangs in the Greenwich Library, but is scheduled to go back to the school when a renovated building reopens next year.

For some residents whose families have attended the school for generations, the mural doesn't belong anywhere else.

"It was a battle scene, but if anything it was an inspirational battle scene," said Marisa Nigiro, a member of the third of four generations of her family to attend the school. "Unfortunately today, we psychoanalyze everything."

But PTA President Laura DiBella, who also attended the school, said former students do not remember the painting as disturbing because it was dirty and hung too high to be seen clearly.

"I thought it was phenomenal growing up, but it was a different time," she said. "There was no Columbine or anything like that, and the schools have really done a lot of work on anti-violence. We are now promoting tolerance, accepting differences and all of that, and it doesn't belong in an elementary school."

She said the painting frightened her sons, ages 3 and 4, when they saw it at the library. She also said a depiction of Native Americans with tomahawks may not be appropriate.

She and Rau have asked parents to look at the mural and weigh in on whether it is too disturbing to hang in the school.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: art; censorship; israelputnam; politicalcorrectness; revolutionarywar; wpa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: Graybeard58
The school plainly needs some manly art. This would put the fear of God in the little darlings.

And no, those aren't Mohammadens.

41 posted on 06/06/2006 9:49:07 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

I love WPA art. Have a mural down the street.


42 posted on 06/06/2006 9:51:00 PM PDT by PghBaldy (If my ancestors acted like the current crop of "immigrants", you would have to "press 2" for Polish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Thanks for the heads up on this one, but I pinged my CT list to a similar thread yesterday:

Mural may not be welcomed back to school

43 posted on 06/06/2006 9:55:17 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
"I thought it was phenomenal growing up, but it was a different time," she said. "There was no Columbine or anything like that, and the schools have really done a lot of work on anti-violence. We are now promoting tolerance, accepting differences and all of that, and it doesn't belong in an elementary school."

She said the painting frightened her sons, ages 3 and 4, when they saw it at the library. She also said a depiction of Native Americans with tomahawks may not be appropriate.

Tells a lot about modern liberalism.

44 posted on 06/06/2006 9:59:46 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Related thread from 2000

Abolitionist's rifle engulfs N.J. artist in fray [A PC conundrum]

 

45 posted on 06/06/2006 10:00:38 PM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

That is one beautiful mural.


46 posted on 06/06/2006 10:55:51 PM PDT by I still care ("Remember... for it is the doom of men that they forget" - Merlin, from Excalibur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
That is sad beyond measure. The very things the folks of NJ should be celebrating to their kids, they think should be hidden from them.

Took the family to a baseball game recently. Around the Texas Rangers stadium are some smallish friezes, depicting in monochrome relief scenes from Texas history. We looked at'em all -- and I proudly pointed out each character from that episode in San Antonio. Travis going down from being shot, Bowie prone bearing his knife, Crockett swinging his rifle, Santa Ana commanding the Mexican army...these are the inspiring characters of every Texans youth, and should always be so.

I've never heard of Putnam, but every NJ schoolchild should!

47 posted on 06/07/2006 4:08:09 AM PDT by Churchjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
If all these anti violence policies are so good, why are students more violent than they used to be?

That would make a pretty good tagline.
48 posted on 06/07/2006 4:21:15 AM PDT by Beckwith (The liberal media has picked sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brett66

-I don't suppose it ever crossed their mind to TEACH what the picture might mean?-

Clearly the publik edoocashun indoctrination version of events is actively teaching kids that the R.W. was just a bunch of violent thugs killing and maiming the Mother Country for no reason. Better to take it back to Town Hall where somebody might appreciate it?


49 posted on 06/12/2006 2:47:23 PM PDT by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy
What has happened to American schools? When I was a little boy, boys loved gore.

Did you read any of the EC comics from the 50s?

50 posted on 06/12/2006 3:33:24 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

I did not.


51 posted on 06/12/2006 6:34:51 PM PDT by PghBaldy (If my ancestors acted like the current crop of "immigrants", you would have to "press 2" for Polish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Me neither as I was born after that storm passed (there were congressional hearings and all). But it does prove that sensibilities have drastically changed when in the 50s kids could take these kinds of comics to school and now when children are expelled for drawing pictures of guns.


52 posted on 06/12/2006 6:38:12 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson