Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SandRat
* "Fozzie": Ultra-low fuel burn. The airplane is designed to cruise at a much reduced speed — 500 mph rather than the typical 600-plus mph of current jets. That would add an hour to the typical transcontinental flight.

If they made the plane more comfortable then they might have a winner.

Slightly more space for the same ticket price as the faster planes and they would sell seats.

16 posted on 06/06/2006 7:40:29 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (The bottom 60% does 40% of the work, the top 40% does 60% of the work. Just who are the "workers"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Harmless Teddy Bear
"Fozzie": Ultra-low fuel burn. The airplane is designed to cruise at a much reduced speed — 500 mph rather than the typical 600-plus mph of current jets. That would add an hour to the typical transcontinental flight.

That slower flight time also means that airlines will lose that plane's availability while it's still in the air instead of being turned around for the next flight. Instead of five flights a day the airline may only be able to squeeze in four flights.

When you're paying $100 ~ $150 million for an airliner, you want to make as many flights a day as possible.

22 posted on 06/06/2006 8:29:28 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson