Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freekitty; Jim Noble

We need this amendment because while Forty-three states have statutes defining marriage to one man and one woman... activist liberal judges (most recently in Georgia) have been saying those statutes are unconstitutional.

So we need to make the definition of traditional marriage part of our national Constitution.


18 posted on 06/06/2006 4:21:47 PM PDT by JulieRNR21 (Katherine Harris is 'In It to Win It' .....Go here: http://www.electharris.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: JulieRNR21
So we need to make the definition of traditional marriage part of our national Constitution.

My point was that you cannot put traditional marriage into the Constitution, or anywhere else, because people overwhelmingly favor easy divorce and decriminalization of adultery.

Calling what's left after you allow unilateral divorce and don't punish adultery "traditional marriage" is really dishonest. There's nothing traditional about it at all.

40 posted on 06/06/2006 6:13:33 PM PDT by Jim Noble (And you know what I'm talkin' 'bout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson