To: .cnI redruM
I think the word subsidize is a real stretch when attempting to relate it to the estate tax. They have already taken a bounteous share of what the rich make in comparison to the poor, but to have to give it back is foreign to the nature.
5 posted on
06/06/2006 8:05:46 AM PDT by
wita
(truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
To: wita
The estate tax should go, I agree. What I found vexing was the author's attempt to claim our government wasn't playing Robin Hood for all the wrong reasons.
8 posted on
06/06/2006 8:11:01 AM PDT by
.cnI redruM
(Black holes are where God divided by zero. - Steven Wright)
To: wita
2 million is a pittance in some areas of the country.
It will barely buy a 1000 sq ft condo in Manhatten
It will buy 2 4000 sq ft homes in suburban Wash DC.
It will provide a decent but not lavish retirement for a couple.
It will buy a small cottage in Palo Alto.
Now in Columbus Ohio, it will buy the mother of all houses.
19 posted on
06/06/2006 8:25:05 AM PDT by
staytrue
(Moonbat conservatives-those who would rather have the democrats win.)
To: wita
They have already taken a bounteous share of what the rich make in comparison to the poor, but to have to give it back is foreign to the nature.Give it back? They are going to write the people a check?
25 posted on
06/06/2006 8:33:35 AM PDT by
Protagoras
("A real decision is measured by the fact that you have taken a new action"... Tony Robbins)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson