No, but she does make some basic mistakes that anyone with hard scientific training would get, regardless of the side of the evolutionary issue one is on.
There are many, many, legitimate ways to attack evolution, but the "no transitionary fossils" canard is simply a mistake up there with arguing the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
OK, let's review here. Liberals filter thought pervasively in public schools, MSM, and even universities BUT NOT our beloved and hallowed halls of science!!! Does not compute...
Sorry, but they've had over a hundred years to 'play' with the theory of evolution as well as the related 'scientific' publications. The same 'scientific' publications which ignore anything that sounds 'creationist' out of hand. Quite frankly, ToE rests on less science and more religion than the creation theory.
Please try reading some of the anti-evo literature out there. I suggest you start with http://www.creationscience.com/ followed by several books referenced in/by same (i.e. 'Darwin's Black Box', 'Bones of Contention', 'Icons of Evolution', 'Creation Science, etc.). Never have I reviewed more 'science' that is full of lies than the ToE.