Posted on 06/05/2006 11:20:04 PM PDT by Moonman62
Young or old, man or woman, smoker or non-smoker – no matter what category you fit into, cigarette smoke can weaken your bones and increase your risk for fractures, according to new research presented this week at the IOF World Congress on Osteoporosis in Toronto. Smoking has long been known to increase the risk for osteoporosis in women, but the new studies, two conducted in Sweden and one in China, find that smoking also hastens the erosion of men's bones. In addition, the Chinese study demonstrates, for the first time, that even second-hand smoke can significantly increase the risk for osteoporosis and fractures in both men and women.
Bad News from GOOD Study
The deleterious effects of smoking can readily be detected in young bones. That's one conclusion from the Gothenburg Osteoporosis and Obesity Determinants (GOOD) study, which has been following the health of young Swedish men (see conference Abstract No. OC31).
"Though smoking has previously been linked to low bone density in the elderly population, its effects on adolescents has remained controversial. Now, we clearly demonstrate that young smokers also have significant losses in bone density," said Mattias Lorentzon, lead author on the study.
Lorentzon, working with Prof. Claes Ohlsson and colleagues at the Center for Bone Research at the Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, measured bone mineral density--a measure of bone strength--in over 1,000 Swedish men between 18 and 20 years old. They found that in smokers, bone density in the spine, hip, and body as a whole, was lower than in their non-smoking peers. The most significant effects were in the hip, where the mineral density was over 5% lower than in non-smokers--typically, a 10% loss of bone mineral density doubles the risk of fracture.
Their results explain why previous findings have been equivocal. In this case the researchers used a sophisticated computer assisted X-ray machine (CAT scanner) to get three-dimensional images of bone. These 3D images showed that smoking primarily affects a specific type of bone called cortical bone. This very dense bone forms a layer, similar to the enamel on teeth, around softer, spongy bone. Lorentzon and colleagues found that smoking reduces the thickness of cortical bone. The findings indicate that smoking may significantly affect bone strength. "If you think of bone as a pencil, then the thicker the pencil the harder it will be to break," said Lorentzon.
Mr. OS--Sweden
In a separate study, Center for Bone Research colleagues Dan Mellström and co-workers have been measuring how a variety of lifestyle and biological factors influence the likelihood of bone fracture in elderly men (see conference Abstract No. P117). Mr. OS, as it is called, is being conducted internationally. Mellström and colleagues have recruited over 3,000 elderly men for the Swedish part of the study and correlated smoking history with bone density measurements and fracture incidence. "We find that in elderly men a history of smoking is associated with weak bones and almost a twofold increase in vertebral fracture incidence," said Mellström, who presented the data this week in Toronto. Vertebral fractures are a major sign of osteoporosis and a strong predictor of future fractures.
Mellström and colleagues took X-rays of the neck and back spine in over 1,300 men to screen for vertebral fractures--these fractures are often asymptomatic and go undetected. They found that nearly 17 percent of the men had an identifiable vertebral fracture, but when they compared fracture rate to smoking history they found that 24% of smokers had fractures compared to only 14% or those who never smoked. They also measured bone mineral density in the hip, thigh bone, and spine. Mellström reported that bone density in all regions tested was significantly lower in men who were current smokers, or who used to smoke. Overall the findings suggest that smoking reduces bone strength and dramatically increases the risk for bone fractures.
Second-Hand Smoke, First-Hand Problem
In the first ever analysis of the effects of second-hand smoke on bone density, researchers in the U.S. have found that Chinese men and pre-menopausal women have significantly lower bone density if they are exposed to second-hand smoke, even if they are themselves smokers (see conference Abstract No. P114).
Yu-Hsiang Hsu and colleagues from the Harvard School of Public Health measured hip bone mineral density in over 14,000 men and women in rural China--hip fractures are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. They also used recorded non-spine fractures and smoking history.
When they correlated smoking with osteoporosis and fracture history, they found that the largest effects were seen in pre-menopausal, non-smoking women--only 6% of women in the study were smokers, versus 87% of men. "Compared to non-smokers that are not exposed to second-hand smoke, premenopausal women exposed to second-hand smoke have a threefold higher risk of having osteoporosis and a 2.6 times greater risk for a non-spine fracture," said Hsu. Though smoking itself is a risk factor for osteoporosis, Hsu and colleagues also deduced that smokers were at increased risk if they were also exposed to smoke from other family members on a daily basis.
Though this is the first reported study of the effects of second-hand smoke on bone health, previous studies have reported that second-hand smoke may alter levels of estrogen, which is a key hormone for bone health in both women and men, Hsu explained. "Our finding is consistent with this hypothesis," said Hsu, who now plans a follow up study to correlate serum levels of cotinine, a nicotine derivative that only appears in blood of those exposed to tobacco smoke, with serum hormone levels.
###
Osteoporosis, in which the bones become porous and break easily, is one of the world's most common and debilitating diseases. The result: pain, loss of movement, inability to perform daily chores, and in many cases, death. One out of three women over 50 will experience osteoporotic fractures, as will one out of five men 1, 2, 3.
Unfortunately, screening for people at risk is far from being a standard practice. Osteoporosis can, to a certain extent, be prevented, it can be easily diagnosed and effective treatments are available.
The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) is the only worldwide organization dedicated to the fight against osteoporosis. It brings together scientists, physicians, patient societies and corporate partners. Working with its 172 member societies in 85 locations, and other healthcare-related organizations around the world, IOF encourages awareness and prevention, early detection and improved treatment of osteoporosis.
1 Melton U, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C et al. How many women have osteoporosis? Journal of Bone Mineral Research, 1992; 7:1005-10 2 Kanis JA et al. Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmo. Osteoporosis International, 2000; 11:669-674 3. Melton LJ, et al. Bone density and fracture risk in men. JBMR. 1998; 13:No 12:1915
IOF World Congress on Osteoporosis, held every two years, is the only global congress dedicated specifically to all aspects of osteoporosis. Besides the opportunity to learn about the latest science and developments in diagnosis, treatment and the most recent socio-economic studies, participants have the chance to meet and exchange ideas with other physicians from around the world. All aspects of osteoporosis will be covered during the Congress which will comprise lectures by invited speakers presenting cutting edge research in the field, and 35 oral presentations and more than 680 poster presentations selected from 720 submitted abstracts. More than 70 Meet the Expert Sessions covering many practical aspects of diagnosis and management of osteoporosis are also on the program.
For more information on osteoporosis and IOF please visit: www.osteofound.org
For further information, please contact: Paul Spencer Sochaczewski, Head of Communications, International Osteoporosis Foundation: Tel. +41 22 994 0100 - Fax. +41 22 994 0101 - E-mail: IOFnews@osteofound.org or Andrew Leopold, Weber Shandwick Worldwide 400-207 Queen's Quay West, Toronto, Tel: +1 416 964 6444 E-mail: aleopold@webershandwick.com
Great link - thank you! I'm going to have to figure out a way to keep the squirrels from harvesting my peaches before I do!
In one of your original posts you claimed it did. Therefore my question remains legitimate. If nicotine is the reason for the hindering of bone healing, why are they only looking at one source of nicotine. Nicotine is nicotine is nicotine whether it comes from tobacco, tomatoes, peppers, eggplant, artichokes, or nicotine patches.
To determine that it is ONLY nicotine from smoking they would have to rule out any other source of nicotine. I seriously doubt they can find enough control subjects who have never injested any form of nicotinein their life. Therefore they will be unable to pinpoint that the only nicotine cause is the nicotine from tobacco.
Nicotine has already been known for quite awhile to hinder bone healing.
3 posted on 06/06/2006 2:48:28 AM EDT by Moonman62
If you think all these researchers are incredibly stupid to exclude nicotine containing foods then email them and let us all know the response. Maybe they are all in on a conspiracy.
Yes, I should have phrased that as smoking, not nicotine. But nicotine is the suspected agent.
>>>>>But then I haven't seen any smokers walking into a non-smoking bar with a basket of tomatoes to cure their nicotine fits either.
Try artichokes.
What is it with you and your hang up on the word conspiracy - you are the only one using it?
The foods I mention are all members of the nightshade family, as is tobacco and all contain nicotine.
I really wish someone would explain to me what a nicotine fit is. I know the term was used as a joke when I was in HS, but it now seems to have become some sort of mantra of the anti-smoker cadre.
Cotinine is the bio-marker of nicotine in the system, but there is no way of determining the exact source of the cotinine, because there are numerous sources of nicotine.
Then it should be studied from all sources.
As a matter of fact that is exactly what I had for lunch!!!! Steamed, dipped in garlic butter....YUM!!!
and on that note, I'm headed for the garden center before it starts raining again, to obtain more nicotine containing plants for my garden.
I'll pick this up when I return!!! Later gator.
I also would like to know how much so called second hand smoke comes from cigarettes versus cooking fires that they still widely use.
Okra is a member of the nightshade family too. Do you know if it also high in nicotine also?
A doctor friend who unfortunately is deceased used to advise all his arthritis patients to leave the fruit from plants from the nightshade family alone. He said in some it aggravated the symptoms.
See, the problem here is it isn't the 'smoke' that is a problem.
It is the chemicals added to the manufactured cigarettes that are a hazard.
Most of the problems with cigarettes are the chemicals like formaldehyde.
But, for some reason, the focus is to blame it on the nicotine.
I think it is called "follow the money". The one universal truth we can always depend on.
Why put those chemicals in it is what I don't understand. I don't think they do that to cigars and pipe tobacco.
I've never checked out okra, but if it is a member of the nightshade family it most likely contains nicotine. I'm growing it for the first time this year, as a matter of fact.
Nightshade fruits aggravating arthritis is a new idea to me. i had never heard that. Not saying it isn't true, just never heard it.
Nor are they in loose tobacco for making your own cigarettes.
Around the same time my husband and I switched to making our own we repainted our living room, dining room and downstairs bath. 3 years later, as we were taking down all the pictures, etc, from the walls to pack to move we noticed - there was no difference in the walls behind the frames and where there were none. I have also noticed no residue on windows when I wash them.
And the smell doesn't stay on your body.
The doc swore 40% of his patients would have little or no arthritis pain, if they just wouldn't eat tomatoes or peppers.
Maybe it is to create a distinct flavor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.