To: Beelzebubba
The local media referred to one outdoor rifle range here as a potential "terrorist training facility". I'm surprised that wasn't worked in here.
2 posted on
06/05/2006 6:42:12 PM PDT by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: Beelzebubba
Seems like a good idea to me! Why would anyone object to such training?
Yep, I really do know the answer to that question. "Ignorance"!
3 posted on
06/05/2006 6:44:26 PM PDT by
RAY
To: Beelzebubba
WHEN are we going to start controlling this dangerous press??
5 posted on
06/05/2006 6:50:35 PM PDT by
pabianice
To: Chode; Eaker; Dead Corpse; Joe Brower
6 posted on
06/05/2006 6:51:33 PM PDT by
King Prout
(many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
To: Beelzebubba
I would bet that the author is a metrosexual sissy. Anyone who gets scared at the thought of people learning how to use guns better is a sissy.
To: Beelzebubba
Isn't one of the gun grabbers arguments for not allowing civilians to carry guns that they aren't trained like cops and other security professionals?
Now they want to gripe cause they're getting the training?
I love it when libs destroy there own arguments.
11 posted on
06/05/2006 7:18:45 PM PDT by
Jotmo
("Voon", said the mattress.)
To: Beelzebubba
Anyone in the NH, Northern Mass, southern Maine area are welcome to my club ( http://www.majorwaldron.com/ ) for "Tactical" training (you don't have to be a member for this). (Go to the site and click on the calendar - we hold this on the 1st Saturdays of each month).
Its not super duper stuff, a lot of fun and tought by our President who is a retired Marine Recon/Scout. Mainly long range shooting and such.
Please drop by if you can (cost is minimal) ... you'll have fun and get a lot of questions answered by our President on anything gun/sniper/target shooting related questions.
12 posted on
06/05/2006 7:23:35 PM PDT by
MaDeuce
(Do it to them, before they do it to you! (MaDuce = M2HB .50 BMG))
To: Beelzebubba
So...liberals think no one should have a firearm without the proper training.
They also think no one should have the proper training.
They are a confusing lot.
13 posted on
06/05/2006 7:23:59 PM PDT by
Sergio
(If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
To: Beelzebubba
Oh, those horrid peasants and their evil guns! I think I'm going to faint! /sarcasm
14 posted on
06/05/2006 7:26:18 PM PDT by
Wilhelm Tell
(True or False? This is not a tag line.)
To: Beelzebubba; All
The self-regulating system has broken down in the past. In 1993, a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service officer who offered weapons and survival training in rural Pennsylvania taught a group of men from New York how to fire assault rifles and stage mock assaults on a nearby power substation. The men were later found to have been affiliated with the terrorist group that bombed the World Trade Center that year.
Uh huh. So the civilian agencies that teach civilians how to better defend themselves are a hazard because some FEDERAL ALPHABET COP taught a group of TERRORISTS how to shoot their thingies.
Give me a break! It sounds more to me like the threat is from a runaway and out of control Federal government and their violent and uncontrolled employees. Ban the Federal government - for the chirrun!
17 posted on
06/05/2006 8:03:20 PM PDT by
WorkingClassFilth
(Wisdom of the Leftist Tao, No.379: Women are men, men are children and children are adults.)
To: Beelzebubba
hehe- we're about to open a
paintball facility at my church! I suppose we could play a Crusaders and Muslims scenario...
19 posted on
06/05/2006 8:31:23 PM PDT by
ovrtaxt
(My donation to the GOP went here instead: http://www.minutemanhq.com/hq/index.php)
To: Beelzebubba
I thought they were for gun control. How can you control you gun unless you practice?
To: Beelzebubba
More leftist S***, demanding more "regulation" of the American citizenry.
"Shall not be infringed"!
Real conservatives fully support the entire and unabridged constitution, of which the BOR and 2nd amendment are integral components.
21 posted on
06/05/2006 8:58:25 PM PDT by
Richard-SIA
("The natural progress of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield" JEFFERSON)
To: Beelzebubba
sounds like a great idea for a fathers day present!!!
26 posted on
06/06/2006 5:12:51 AM PDT by
Katya
(Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
To: Beelzebubba
28 posted on
06/06/2006 6:35:52 AM PDT by
absolootezer0
("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
To: Beelzebubba
CCW permit owners should definatly be allowed into these schools.
To: Beelzebubba
Some anti-violence activists and even a few weapons-school officials say that somebody -- a government agency or an industry association -- ought to set out rules for acceptable training and students. Anti violence activists wouldn't approve of industry regulation, and they'd have government regulate it unto death. The school officials would want to keep down the competition, if there was all that much demand in the first place.
Meanwhile, criminals and terrorists will conduct their own training, in prison if nowhere else.
36 posted on
06/07/2006 7:28:34 PM PDT by
El Gato
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson