Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SamuraiScot
b) he broke new ground in judicial overreach in presuming to tell the litigants what science is, rather than just ruling on the case and shutting up.

You are neglecting to mention that the defendants in the case specifically requested a ruling to this effect.
33 posted on 06/05/2006 5:44:09 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio


<< You are neglecting to mention that the defendants in the case specifically requested a ruling to this effect. >>


Thou shalt not use logic when dealing with a lynch mob.


52 posted on 06/05/2006 6:22:55 PM PDT by Almagest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Dimensio
(He broke new ground in judicial overreach in presuming to tell the litigants what science is, rather than just ruling on the case and shutting up.)

You are neglecting to mention that the defendants in the case specifically requested a ruling to this effect.

I didn't see the motion, but even if they did, it doesn't excuse him taking them up on it, or his Judge Elvis routine. If they'd told him to jump off a building, would he have done that, too? (Maybe so.)

It's just not his job to decide what is science, and considering what he said about the Constitution, I'm not sure he should be talking about the law, either.

161 posted on 06/05/2006 11:26:49 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson