You are neglecting to mention that the defendants in the case specifically requested a ruling to this effect.
I didn't see the motion, but even if they did, it doesn't excuse him taking them up on it, or his Judge Elvis routine. If they'd told him to jump off a building, would he have done that, too? (Maybe so.)
It's just not his job to decide what is science, and considering what he said about the Constitution, I'm not sure he should be talking about the law, either.
placemarker
You didn't read the decision either. You should at least TRY to understand what you are griping about before making a fool of yourself in public.
but even if they did, it doesn't excuse him taking them up on it, or his Judge Elvis routine.
He was required to "take them up on it". That was exactly what this case was about. Judge Elvis? What the heck does that mean?
If they'd told him to jump off a building, would he have done that, too? (Maybe so.)
Did your momma teach you that one?
It's just not his job to decide what is science, and considering what he said about the Constitution, I'm not sure he should be talking about the law, either.
Since you say that you didn't "read the motion", and it is clear that you didn't read the decision, and it is also obvious that you didn't read the perjurous testimony on the part of the school board, I doubt that you've ever actually read the constitution. (Reading does seem to be a problem with you). Therefore, I'll trust the judge's decision over your misguided opinion.