Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
The framers understood that the document would be modified over time if it was to remain relevant.

Typical lib BS.
3 posted on 06/05/2006 12:38:53 PM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JamesP81
Sooooooo, The Bill of Rights....Of The People, By The People, For The People.....all 10 amendments that make up The Bill of Rights...EVERY ONE EXCEPT THAT ONE???

My arse.

5 posted on 06/05/2006 12:43:16 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JamesP81

I hope you read the whole article. That concluding remarks don't strike me as liberal.


8 posted on 06/05/2006 12:43:50 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JamesP81
Typical lib BS.

No, here, the author is correct. He makes an error however with this line:

One of the strengths of the Constitution is its inherent flexibility

The constitution is a set of inflexible laws which may be amended through a formal and difficult process.

19 posted on 06/05/2006 12:49:10 PM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9 (DR #1692 Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JamesP81
You're 100% right about that.

A lot of grief would be spared if they'd only read the black parts of Constitution.

66 posted on 06/05/2006 1:23:57 PM PDT by rvoitier ("And if talk is cheap anywhere, perhaps it is cheapest, quite frankly, in the Congress." Vitter(R-La)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JamesP81; neverdem

<< The FRamers understood that the document would be modified over time if it was to remain relevant.

Typical lib BS. >>

Yep.

Absolutely.

And as demonstrative as its author's intellectual and moral bankruptcy and of the content of her character as is her inability to understand the crystal clarity of "the
right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

What's the bet she can, viewing it as she obviously does through the Liberal Psychosis' distorting lens, also find the "right" to willy-nilly slaughter infants among our Constitution's other crystal clarity ?


154 posted on 06/05/2006 4:55:02 PM PDT by Brian Allen (All that is required to ensure the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JamesP81

Oh, the founders knew that the document was imperfect and they knew that it would be modified. That is why they put in a process for amending it. Liberals want to skip over that messy stuff and just arbitrarily change the meanings of the words.


168 posted on 06/05/2006 7:05:48 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson