A Constitution which is "inherently flexible" cannot be "the supreme Law," as its text describes it. Instead, it becomes whatever five unelected Justices on the Supreme Court decide it should be. Madison, Hamilton and Jay carefully explained why, in order to accomplish its central purpose as the distilled decision of the people of the US, the Constitution must be "the supreme Law." Otherwise, it is reduced at any moment to a nullity.
Brown needs to do more reading and less writing on the subject of the Constitution. She is spreading ignorant claptrap, here.
P.S. info. My primary is over, but because of legal and ethical problems, the incumbent may withdraw/be forced out. He is also losing in the latest poll (5/28) to the Democrat challenger. I seek to be the replacement nominee. For more information see my website. I still need your help.
Congressman Billybob
Latest article: "Stomping on the Constitution, California-Style"
Good luck! Thanks for the link!