Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A step backward in solving energy crises
Anchorage Daily News ^ | June 5, 2006 | Voice of the Times

Posted on 06/05/2006 8:53:53 AM PDT by thackney

Congress took another lurch in the wrong direction on energy the other day when a bipartisan coalition voted to retain the ban on oil and gas exploration on the Outer Continental Shelf.

Despite painfully high energy prices and a perilous political situation in the Middle East, where the nation still gets much of its oil, Republicans and Democrats alike righteously decided to maintain the foolish ban that has kept 85 percent of the shelf off-limits to energy exploration since 1981.

The vote was 279 to 141, with 94 Republicans jumping aboard the environmental bandwagon jammed with Democrats.

The Wall Street Journal pointed out that ban supporters said they were worried about the nation's coastlines, even though solid evidence suggests there is really very little risk.

Last year, Hurricane Katrina blasted through one of America's primary offshore oil producing areas, with great damage to oil and gas facilities there. But there were no oil spills, the result of modern planning and spill-prevention equipment.

The Journal also noted that Canadians are drilling for gas in the Canadian waters of the Great Lakes, even though the area on the American side remains off-limits. And Cuba is exploring for gas in its own territorial waters, which come within 45 miles of the United States' shores. But the American side is off-limits to American explorers.

Perhaps Alaska should be happy that Congress is taking such a bull-headed approach, since the high price of natural gas is making feasible a pipeline from the North Slope to Alberta and the U.S. Midwest. The high price relates to limited supply, a shortage that might not exist if the nation tapped the Outer Continental Shelf.

... And the coastal plain is the most promising area left in North America for a major oil discovery.

(Excerpt) Read more at adn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: alaska; anwr; energy; oil
Congress and environmentalists holding America hostage and helping to fund our enemies.
1 posted on 06/05/2006 8:53:53 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

And the coastal plain

That would be the ANWR coastal plain.

2 posted on 06/05/2006 8:55:12 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I guess Americans are okay with terrorism because they did not raise much of a protest over this.


3 posted on 06/05/2006 8:56:21 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

No more donations to the Republican party until Anwar is passed!


4 posted on 06/05/2006 9:21:16 AM PDT by stubernx98 (cranky, but reasonable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Foreign countries with no such limitations will eventually have our nation surrounded by platforms if this idiotic mindset continues in Congress.


5 posted on 06/05/2006 9:22:37 AM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Any Bill number so we can review the language and the voting stats of our reps?


6 posted on 06/05/2006 9:31:45 AM PDT by MaDeuce (Do it to them, before they do it to you! (MaDuce = M2HB .50 BMG))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
ENERGY CRISIS
Made in Washington DC.
7 posted on 06/05/2006 9:38:11 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
"That would be the ANWR coastal plain."

I'd say any old coastal plain--not just ANWR. Where there's oil--go and drill. If the Scandahoovians can safely drill offshore in the North Sea (probably the most dangerous place to drill offshore on the planet), then we can safely drill off Florida and California's "pristine beaches".

8 posted on 06/05/2006 9:41:06 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: P-40
People are fricking idiots. When it was below-zero and people complained about high heating costs, they immediately blamed the oil and energy companies.

This is all a scam anyway. People then demand more heating and energy-assistance from the government, thus creating more gov't dependency. I hate to see how high energy costs will be in the next 20 years. Seniors from the northern and northeastern states will be living in the South and West, IMO.

9 posted on 06/05/2006 9:42:39 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Conservatism is moderate, it is the center, it is the middle of the road)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
I'd say any old coastal plain--not just ANWR.

Well, the coastal plain land next to ANWR that is under Alaska's control, has been drilled. Where the Fed's control it is our hang up.

10 posted on 06/05/2006 9:54:50 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MaDuce

I contacted the editor. Their information came from a Wall Street Journal article without the bill number. I've searched through http://thomas.loc.gov/. There are lots of bills dealing with OCS but I did not find that particular vote. This may have been in reference to the same bill.

http://newsbyus.com/more.php?id=3697_0_1_0_M

Sorry I wasn't more help.


11 posted on 06/05/2006 11:49:38 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stubernx98
"No more donations to the Republican party until Anwar is passed!"

This was part of my response to some creep from the GOP who called my house on Sunday looking from money.

I told him that the GOP would not get another cent from me until they stopped acting like RINOs on, immigration, Anwar, redistribution of wealth programs, growth of government.

Right now I only have 2 choices, vote for a party that only promises to reduce the size of government, secure the borders, get us off rag head oil but does not do those things or vote for the party which tells me they won't do any of those things. In this case the communist left is at least being honest in what they want to do.

Either way my vote does not count for much EXCEPT the USSC! To move the court back to center from the communist extremes of the past is the single reason for me to vote GOP.

12 posted on 06/05/2006 12:06:37 PM PDT by Wurlitzer (The difference between democrats and terrorists is the terrorists don't claim to support the troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson