Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush is the Next Reagan
Persian Journal ^ | Jun 4, 2006 | Slater Bakhtavar

Posted on 06/04/2006 2:24:14 PM PDT by nuconvert

Bush is the Next Reagan

Jun 4, 2006

Slater Bakhtavar - Persian Journal

The same people who heavily criticized former President Reagan for his tough stance against Communism and for his aggressive push for democracy in Eastern Europe are now attacking President Bush for his tough stance against fundamentalism and his aggressive push for democracy in the Middle East.

-They argued then that Communism would never fall - it did They argue now that Islamic Fundamentalism will never fall - it will

-They argued then that the Soviet Union is too strong - it wasn't

They argue now that the insurgency is too strong - it isn't

-They argued that Reagans vision of democracy in East Europe would never work - it did

They argue now that Bushs vision of democracy for the mid-east would never work - it will

They argued then that Reagans evil empire speech was a failure - it wasn't

They argue now that Bushs axis of evil speech is a failure - it won't be

-They argued then that former soviet bloc countries wouldn't embrace democracy - they did

They argue now that middle east countries would never embrace democracy - they will

-They argued then that Eastern Europeans nations would never be our allies - they are

They argue now that middle eastern countries will never be our allies - they will be

-They argued then that people without God could never embrace democracy - they did

They argue now that Muslims will never embrace democracy - they will

-They argued then that President Reagan was unrealistic - he wasn't

They argue now that President Bush is unrealistic - he'll prove he isn't

-They argued then democracy isn't universal to former Communists - it was

They argue now democracy isn't universal to Middle Easterners - it will be

-They argued then that funding of pro-democracy groups in Eastern European countries won't work - it did

They argue now that funding of pro-democracy groups won't work in the Middle East - it will

The same exact critcism was directed at Reagan. The future will be the judge of President Bush and my guess is that he will be judged as the Great Liberator of the Middle East.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; bushdoctrineunfolds; deify; democracy; liberators; middleeast; reagan; spendalot; strongleader; weakposters; worstprezever
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 701-716 next last
To: nopardons

[sarcasm] During his first campaign Reagan said he'd abolish the Department of Education. But he never did! He lied! He wa'nt no conservative no-how![sarcasm off]


441 posted on 06/04/2006 7:46:09 PM PDT by zook ("We all knew someone in primary school who had a really powerful magnet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

I have NO idea, but I can recognize a damed troll and a retread, at that, immediately. :-)


442 posted on 06/04/2006 7:47:51 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Well, THAT was entertaining.../sarc


443 posted on 06/04/2006 7:50:59 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Great catch! I guess it WAS birbear.


444 posted on 06/04/2006 7:51:41 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: zook

LOL


445 posted on 06/04/2006 7:52:37 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
Yes, it's my humble belief that Clinton's wanted Newt to win his majority in '94 so that they would have "evil conservatives" to blame.

We took majority because of the pushing of Hellary care, the don't ask do tell and mostly because of the hight tax increase in 40 years that Clinton push throw .. it sure ticked off the Seniors

In fact my Congresswomen at the time .. 5 minutes before the vote swore she would vote against it .. and then went in and voted for the stupid thing

She was later known as One Term Margie

Today her son in known as Chelsea Clinton's boyfriend

446 posted on 06/04/2006 7:55:43 PM PDT by Mo1 (DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
grrr
should be
highest tax increase in 40 years that Clinton push through
447 posted on 06/04/2006 7:56:44 PM PDT by Mo1 (DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145; nopardons
Reading that stuff makes you feel like you need a shower, just like reading DU does.......

So old birbear thought he'd 'teach freepers a lesson' eh? Those guys are SO pathetic!

448 posted on 06/04/2006 7:58:06 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
And it was retroactive to boot, which is unconstitutional!
449 posted on 06/04/2006 7:58:56 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

If you think LP is bad, go try out Clownposse. That is where the LP rejects go.


450 posted on 06/04/2006 7:59:22 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Every person has a photographic memory - but some don't have their flash card installed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Oh..........I missed that the poor fellow didn't even know that. LOL!

I'm guessing from his writing style that he's not even out of college yet. Probably from a California public school. ;)

451 posted on 06/04/2006 8:00:47 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

"Reagan gave us Sandra Day O'Connor..........who supported PBA"

That was a bad pick for sure.


452 posted on 06/04/2006 8:00:54 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

I am not so sanguine that Islam can be as easily uprooted and tossed on the ash-heap of history as Communism was. Still the point about Bush's critics is sound: they are the same folks who were wrong at every turn in the end-game of the Cold War, and they haven't even given us a "gee, we were wrong, sorry. . ." and now they expect us to take their analyses of the present conflict seriously?


453 posted on 06/04/2006 8:01:05 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Ummmmm..........thanks, but no thanks.

I have a hard enough time dealing with the clowns when they visit us here. Unleashed, I can't imagine how filthy they are....

454 posted on 06/04/2006 8:01:56 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
I call LP THE VILLAGE OF THE BANNED. :-)

They HATE FR, but would sell their souls to be reinstated.

455 posted on 06/04/2006 8:03:04 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
So, where it counts........the Supreme Court...........Bush is significantly MORE conservative than Reagan.

Are you beginning to catch on here? Get yourself educated on the history of conservativism, and get your facts straightened out?

456 posted on 06/04/2006 8:04:05 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
And the poor thing kept repeating it...even when I corrected him.

Go figure...........................

457 posted on 06/04/2006 8:04:08 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
They HATE FR, but would sell their souls to be reinstated.

For a site they claim to hate and never want to come back too, they sure as heck devote a lot of their energies trying to trash it.

458 posted on 06/04/2006 8:05:26 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Every person has a photographic memory - but some don't have their flash card installed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Now why do you suppose they want to hang around here with all of us well-balanced conservatives?

We must make them terribly uncomfortable with all that angst they carry around. ;)

459 posted on 06/04/2006 8:05:54 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
It was an AFFIRMATIVE ACTION pick. Someone/s convinced Reagan that he should be the FIRST president to put a female on the SCOTUS. And THAT was the ONLY reason he put her up for the nomination!
460 posted on 06/04/2006 8:06:07 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 701-716 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson