[Doc Savage]

Talk about ignorance. You should know. Apparently you are unable to deduce the underlying PURPOSE of this story. This was a concocted story listing every "emotional, touchy-feely, anti-Bush, anti-conservative, pro-abortion (read murder)" leftist agitprop as an excuse to liberalize attitudes towards widespread availability of both abortion and morning-after pill use.

A rant? You need to study your dictionary a little more!

[Ichneumon]

[[As always, you are RIGHT! This is a totally concocted story. Sheer nonsense propaganda for RU!]]

[This isn't about RU-486. Why don't you try reading the article before you go off on a rant?]

Talk about ignorance. You should know. Apparently you are unable to deduce the underlying PURPOSE of this story. This was a concocted story listing every "emotional, touchy-feely, anti-Bush, anti-conservative, pro-abortion (read murder)" leftist agitprop as an excuse to liberalize attitudes towards widespread availability of both abortion and morning-after pill use. A rant? You need to study your dictionary a little more!

Oh look, yet another rant. What a surprise.

Look, son, the point remains that you were ranting about RU-486, when this editorial wasn't about that. It was about a *different* kind of "morning after pill" that works on *different* principles, and is neither "abortion" nor "murder" -- it simply prevents ovulation.

And your screeching rant above doesn't alter or excuse your fumbling of your facts, nor does it somehow make me in the "wrong" for correcting your error.

Learn to deal with your mistakes more gracefully.