[MNJohnnie]

Opps, sorry did not see the person Phsstpok was quoting when I responded. I see you made the original statement. I see you have a personal interest in this story.

They can "What if this" to death. It does not change the basic point.

Even if one of the "What If's" being thrown is true, the story being sold by "Iraqi Civil Rights" group is still prove a lie.

Remember, the accusation is a deliberate shot by a Marine in the same room as the child. Deliberate, point blank aimed shot. Since the sole source for the accusations against the Marines is this "Iraqi Civil Rights Group" who made this video for CNN, and the physical evidence presented contradicts their claims of how the supposed wound occurred, ALL their "Evidence" is tainted. They are proven to be liars. The direct, deliberate aimed shot they claim "wounded" this child could not of happened. If they are lying about this, what else are they lying about? Their ties to the terrorists who detonated the IED and killed a Marine maybe?

[freema]

I accept your apology, and appreciate your passion.

[generationfixit]

Okay fellow Minnesotan...

It seems so darn obvious to us why the pussyfooting around?

I think Murtha is about to eat a ton of crow. The only reason the military is doing an ivestigation is because of a CNN video right.....>?.... And propaganda is the enemies best weapon... hmm Murtha being used like a dog????????

Now let's look at this from a conclusion that would be the best.. Say the military comes out after it's investigation and states the video was staged and that it was not the work of US service personell...what then?