.
NEVER FORGET
...Why did then CLINTON Energy Secretary BILL RICHARDSON, a former U.S. Congressman who represented Los Alamos for 11 years,
...knowingly authorize fires to be set near a Los Alamos Nuclear Lab during that area's annual windy season?
...Fires that, of course, ended up engulfing a Los Alamos Nuclear Lab that suddenly found its suitcase Nuclear technology missing during this careful diversion?
Why hasn't anyone asked BILL RICHARDSON,
...WHY..????
NEVER FORGET
.
To be fair, Richardson was secretary of the Department of Energy at the time of the fire. DOE recommended against setting the fires as did the Forest Service. It was the National Parks guys that actually set the fires against recommendations. (It was so windy it took two boxes of matches to the the fire lit.) The idea was to burn out a cluster of trees and reproduce an ancient (30,000 year old) meadow. I don't know why; the trees were only about 100 yrs old. (Now they're only 6 years old.)
Some of you may even remember my posting just before evacuating.
Indeed. Thanks for the ping!
The department (Interior) responsible for the fire was run by Bruce Babbitt not Bill Richardson (Energy).
Missing technology as a result of a "careful diversion"? Hardly, I'm not so paranoid as to believe that setting the fire and losing 400 homes causing billions in damage just to remove and cover up nuclear suitcase technology was in the Clinton-Gore-Richardson plans. Whether someone took advantage of the fire to remove the data or whether it was gone long before the fire started I don't know. But the two events (fire and loss) are coincidental and not directly connected.