To: rhema
I have been a strong opponent to the FMA from the beginning on the principal of restrained government. However at this point, the only option I can see of restraining federal power especially the judiciary is through the FMA. If we don't check the SCOTUS soon this country will be well on it's way to being ruled by a dictatorship of 9 people.
8 posted on
06/03/2006 10:36:40 AM PDT by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by there fruity little club.)
To: spikeytx86
There is a part of our US Constitution called the full faith and credit clause. It is generally interpreted to mean that one state must respect the official decrees and acts of another state. If one state says a couple is married then all states must respect that fact. Or divorced. Or Father and daughter. Man & Goat. Man & Dog. Man, boyfriend, 3 other gals and the goat. Take your pick. Amid this craziness I'm going with a man & a woman.
Without a constitutional provision we (in Florida) or wherever have to recognize unions California or Massachusetts recognizes. No thanks. Clear? :-)
47 posted on
06/03/2006 8:12:29 PM PDT by
Tunehead54
(Nothing funny here ;-)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson