Posted on 06/02/2006 8:33:07 AM PDT by Irontank
Set to debut in theaters in July, the documentary America: From Freedom to Fascism recounts how our government is abandoning the constitutional framework of liberty. Twelve-year-old Ricky Miller wasn't expecting anything dramatic when he answered the door one Saturday morning. His father Scotty Miller had just gotten into the shower. His sister Jennifer was just waking up from a slumber party with some teenage friends. By all appearances, it seemed like a typical early April morning in Virginia Beach.
This changed dramatically when Ricky opened the door and was confronted with 15 heavily armed agents from the Internal Revenue Service and state enforcement agencies. One of them threw Ricky to the floor, stuck a gun in his face, and ordered him to be quiet. The armed raiding party made its way upstairs, where it barged into the bathroom and forced Scotty out of the shower. Another small group burst in on Jennifer and her friends, who had yet to get dressed.
"There were four girls getting dressed, and these guys with guns were watching us," Jennifer recalls on-camera in the new documentary America: From Freedom to Fascism. "We tried to close the door but this guy blocked it with his foot." As the terrified screams of his daughter and her friends could be heard in the background, Scotty Miller, dressed only in a towel that was inadequate to provide him modesty, provoked a near-lethal response from the raiders when he reached toward his drawers to get a pair of underwear.
Scotty had known that there was some trouble down at "The Jewish Mother" in Virginia Beach, one of two locations of a family-owned restaurant chain. His wife Edy, who helped manage the restaurant, had called and frantically told him to come quickly.
Armed IRS-led raiding parties had descended on both locations, seizing cash registers, receipts, price lists, computers, calendars, telephones, Rolodexes - anything that could be pried from the store and carried away. Terrified staff were held at gunpoint while equally unnerved customers were forcibly evicted - some of them literally having the utensils taken from their hands as they tried to enjoy a meal.
For five months, John Colaprete, owner of the restaurant chain; the Miller family; and the chain's other employees were forced "to do business out of a shoebox," Colaprete relates on-camera in the film, while the feds held on to their property and their reputations were ravaged in the press. The store had lost as much as $20,000 on the day of the raid alone. The chain lost its liquor license, along with much of its customer base. Neither Colaprete nor Miller could figure out what, if anything, they had done to provoke a paramilitary raid on a popular and growing small business.
Five months later, they had their answers. Deborah Shofner, a bookkeeper who had been fired by the chain for embezzlement, had made false and malicious accusations against its management to the feds. When the raids failed to produce substantive evidence to corroborate Shofner's charges, the IRS returned the restaurant's property the following August, without so much as a syllable of apology.
By that time, however, "The Jewish Mother" had nearly been driven out of business. Scotty Miller, who was shunned by his friends and traumatized by the federal assault, had been hospitalized with clinical depression.
"A day doesn't go by that I don't wonder what harassment will occur next," Colaprete stated during his 1998 testimony before a Senate investigation of IRS abuses. "I would like to know why this dark entity known as the IRS has come into my life and refused to leave."
Origins of the "Dark Entity"
Colaprete's anguished complaint is echoed by thousands of other Americans whose lives have been disrupted - or ruined - by the same agency. Where did that "Dark Entity" come from? Why must we put up with it? How can we make it go away?
As Aaron Russo demonstrates in his riveting documentary - scheduled to be released in theaters on July 28 - the IRS itself is just one appendage of the "Dark Entity" that seized control over our nation in what could be called the Revolution of 1913.
For three decades prior to making his new documentary, Russo carved out a career of some distinction as a pop music impresario and movie producer (see profile on page 17). In the early 1990s he became concerned about political and social trends that he believed were carrying our once-free nation toward tyranny. Further investigation led Russo to conclude that our nation wasn't drifting toward tyranny, but rather being propelled in that direction by a powerful but dimly seen group of elitists whose handiwork includes the graduated income tax and the IRS. He made the acquaintance of several sober and responsible people willing to risk impoverishment or imprisonment on behalf of their belief that the income tax was a fraud.
But Russo's film isn't just about the "tax protest" movement.
"I set out on a journey to make a film about whether or not there was a law requiring Americans to pay an Income Tax … or was this tax a fraud," Russo explains at the outset of the film. "The process of discovery brought something much more dangerous and frightening to my attention - now I bring it to yours."
"In 1913," he narrates, "America was a free country. Then a band of powerful bankers achieved their fathers' and their great-grandfathers' goal. America has never been the same. Soon the world will not be the same."
This was the year, 1913, in which three critical structural changes - two of which are examined by Russo - grievously undermined our republican form of government. The first was creation of the Federal Reserve System, which Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) describes on-screen as an agency created to "counterfeit money." The other two radical changes were the imposition of the income tax via the 16th Amendment to the Constitution, and the 17th Amendment, which effectively destroyed the U.S. Senate as a body representing the interests of the states. Prior to 1913, money consisted of gold and silver, with paper currency serving only as receipts for the same. In that year, however, Congress abdicated its constitutional duty to "coin" money to the Federal Reserve, which arrogated to itself the right to issue "fiat" currency - paper notes not backed by precious metals, but rather by the "full faith and credit" of the federal government.
Since that time, Russo observes, the dollar has lost roughly 96 percent of its purchasing power, as the Fed - which is owned by a government-created-and-sustained private cartel of largely anonymous banking interests - has relentlessly printed "money" to loan to the U.S. government, at interest.
Although the term was not in use at the time of its creation, the word "fascist" perfectly describes the Federal Reserve System: the Fed is a cartel of private banking interests allied with the central government in a corrupt and mutually enriching entente against the public interest, backed by brute force. The creation of the Fed was thus a key turning point in America's devolution from freedom toward fascism.
From Fascism to Communism
Benito Mussolini, the founder of fascism, was a devout disciple of Karl Marx, who devised a modified form of political collectivism called the corporate state. The system that now governs America bears a much stronger resemblance to Mussolini's corporatism than the constitutional republic we inherited from our Founding Fathers.
"I find it really difficult to believe that so many people consider our nation to be the most successful example of free market capitalism," Russo commented in an interview with The New American. "The foundation of our present economic system is a Central Bank, and the graduated Income Tax - two of the planks of the Communist Manifesto. So even though we're relatively prosperous, largely because of debt, it's really dishonest to say that we're in any sense a [free market] capitalist society."
The objective of communism, according to the Manifesto, can be summarized in a single phrase: "The abolition of private property." That this is the objective of those who exercise control over the executive branch of the U.S. government under both Republican and Democrat administrations can be seen in Russo's film.
Toward the beginning of From Freedom to Fascism, Russo gives time to prominent leaders of what he identifies as the "Tax Honesty Movement," whose members include former IRS investigators like Joe Banister and Sherry Jackson. That movement is devoted to the idea that there is no specific statutory requirement that individual American wage earners file a tax return.
Is there a specific law requiring Americans to file a return? To find the answer to that question, Russo interviewed two strikingly different personalities on camera. One was Rep. Paul; the other was former IRS Commissioner and General Counsel Sheldon Cohen.
Statesman vs. Bureaucrat
"Is there a law requiring Americans to file a 1040?" Russo asked Rep. Paul point-blank.
"Not explicitly," replied the congressman, who has studied the question in depth. "But it's certainly implied.... I can't cite a law. They think it's the law, and they have all the guns."
Russo posed the same question to Cohen, only to have Cohen lead him through dense thickets of doublespeak.
"I believe that a man's labor is his private property," Russo said.
"That's your view," Cohen said with a smirk, "but it's not the law."
Contemplate that answer for a second. If your labor isn't your property, to whom or what does it belong?
The obvious answer is that it belongs to "society," which is supposedly represented by the entity that extracts, at gunpoint, as much of the proceeds of your labor as it sees fit: the federal government.
How does this state of affairs differ in principle - not in consistent practice - from Soviet communism?
"This is a waste of time," grouses Cohen as Russo politely presses his question. "Whatever I say you won't believe." At another point, when Russo highlights contradictions between IRS enforcement policies and various Supreme Court rulings, Cohen plaintively protests: "You've caught me unprepared." Finally Cohen signals for the interview to end just before issuing what Russo, who grew up as a Brooklyn-born Jewish kid in Long Island, identifies as a threat spoken in Yiddish, an expression favored by gangsters that he translated as: "Aaron, nothing can help you."
Oddly enough, Cohen - who may be the most knowledgeable person alive where it comes to the tax code - did not cite Section 6012 of Title 26 of the U.S. Code, which states: "Returns with respect to income taxes under subtitle A [governing tax computations] shall be made by the following: (1)(A) Every individual having for the taxable year gross income which equals or exceeds the exemption amount." The penalty for violation of Section 6012 can be found under Section 7203, which calls for up to a $25,000 fine and one year in prison for an individual "who willfully fails to pay such estimated tax or tax, make such return, keep such records, or supply such information."
It would be expected that a former IRS commissioner would be able to cite those provisions on demand. Yet he finds himself confused and lost amid the abstruse details of the Tax Code. How can we expect to do any better? Laws protecting lives, property, and public order are clear and easily complied with. The same cannot be said of the mare's nest of "laws" and precedents cited by the IRS to justify seizing the product of our labor at gunpoint.
Had Cohen not granted the interview, Russo points out in the closing credits, his film could not have been made. The interview itself is easily worth the price of admission. Forced from his natural habitat - the murky ambiguity favored by all corrupt governments - Cohen withers in the glare of candid inquiry like a vampire who, losing a game of "musical coffins," finds himself trapped in the pitiless advance of dawn's first light.
Americans by the millions need to see that interview. They need to look into Cohen's eyes and see the clinical indifference with which he dismisses the concept of private property, the absolute disregard he shows to the rule of law and the concept of individual liberty. A face needs to be put on the bureaucratic class that is choking our liberty, and Cohen's serves that purpose very well.
Force and Fraud
As Russo documents, the IRS embodies Lenin's definition of dictatorship: "Power without limit, resting directly on force, restrained by no laws, absolutely unrestricted by rules." Illinois resident Whitey Harrell, charged with evading federal income taxes, made a formal request for the statutory authority under which he was required to pay, promising - as any honest person would - to obey the law once it was clearly explained to him. During a videotaped tax hearing, an IRS enforcement official named Agent Craner replied: "I talked to my boss and he told me that my badge is my authority." That non-responsive answer is a pretty suitable paraphrase of Lenin's dictum.
New York Times reporter David Kay Johnston received a similar answer when he posed the same question at an IRS press conference: "Why won't the IRS answer the questions set forth in the petitions from the American people" regarding the statutory authority for collecting income taxes?" Replied IRS functionary Terry Lemons: "The government is answering the question, through our enforcement actions in the courts."
Freedom cannot exist where "laws" are too numerous to count, and too convoluted to be understood by intelligent people of good will. Yes, the IRS can cite statutory language to justify imposing and collecting income taxes, and prosecuting those who don't comply. But here's where the idea that the existing system is based on "law," in the American sense, breaks down: because of the volume, complexity, and self-contradictory nature of the tax code, many honest people - independent business owners in particular - are incapable of compliance. Taxpayers are compelled to offer evidence against themselves, and any time the IRS chooses, it can ruin Americans who have not committed any crimes against persons, property, or public order.
Compounding this outrage is the fact that income taxes are not used to pay the operating expenses of the federal government - a fact discussed by several of the experts interviewed by Russo. The 1983 Grace Commission reported that 100 percent of Income Tax revenues are used to pay interest on the national debt - which is to say that the IRS is in the business of collecting what mobsters call the "vig," or extortionate interest, on behalf of the banking syndicate that operates the Federal Reserve.
And this is made possible, Rep. Paul specifies - and Russo repeatedly emphasizes - because Congress has abdicated its constitutional responsibilities, and the electorate has permitted this to happen.
The real solution, as Russo's film demonstrates, "is not to ignore or defy bad and unjust laws that have been imposed on our nation by the forces that have seized control of our political institutions," comments Alan Scholl, Director of Mission and Campaigns for The John Birch Society. "We gain nothing if freedom-loving people become embroiled in expensive legal battles, or wind up in prison, rather than joining in an effort to restore constitutional government. That process begins with raising public awareness of the damage that's been done to our free institutions, and while our organization doesn't agree with every element of Mr. Russo's film, it has tremendous potential to rouse the American public from its lethal reverie."
Familiar Story, Told Well
Well-informed Americans will be familiar with much of the evidence Russo has capably assembled:
• The operation of a secretive power elite, most visibly represented by the Council on Foreign Relations, which seeks political and financial control of the world;
• The key disclosures made by Georgetown historian Carroll Quigley, who had access to the power elite's papers and secret records, as outlined in his book Tragedy and Hope;
• The use of perpetual war to generate public debt, and constrict individual liberties;
• The relationship between the banking cartel and corporatist trade pacts like NAFTA, GATT, and CAFTA - and how illegal immigration is being used to advance the consolidation of the Western Hemisphere into a European Union-style mega-state, which means the loss of our national identity, our prosperity, and eventually our liberty;
• The emergence of digital microchip technology portending the use of implantable IDs.
Many readers of this magazine are familiar with this story. Tens of millions of others, however, are not. Therein lies the tragedy - and the challenge.
Russo has made a tremendously informative and often entertaining movie. While not without its flaws, it must be said that, examined as a whole, the film defines the problem correctly. It also endorses the correct solution: organized, principled, peaceful citizen activism to induce Congress to reassert its constitutional authority on behalf of the sovereign people.
"Stop being good Democrats," Russo urges. "Stop being good Republicans. Start being good Americans."
In the film's final frames, Russo does invoke the concept of "civil disobedience" - which he defines to include boycotts, strikes, and passive resistance of totalitarian impositions, where necessary and possible. But he never loses sight of the fact that any worthwhile changes have to be made through Congress as a result of conscientious citizen action.
The only thing that is correct about the term "progressives" is that they are responsible for wanting to head this country in a new direction... That is, from the top of Olympus, to the bottom of the $hi!pile.
Yup!
If Orwell wasn't dead to rights, I'll eat my tinfoil hat!
What we are seeing worldwide, is the same race to militarist statism - the very same that Hayek (RWR's fav economist) tried to warn the world about in the 30's vis Germany. This is where the world's financial and political elites make the most money off the backs of the masses, while concentrating ever more power that always diminishes our liberties.
"Over the next 10 years experts predict the reform measures will cost the IRS $12.9 billion, mostly in lost collections of taxes and penalties. "
I don't know whether this figure came to fruition, but this is the problem with the tax protest movement. That lost revenue means that ultimately, law-abiding taxpayers will have to pay more to provide the services which government provides.
And don't get me wrong, I think that the government wastes a lot of our tax money. But the answer to that problem lies with spending reform, and doing away with pork-barrel spending, not with refusing to pay at all.
Join these guys, if you want to help make a real, substantive difference:
http://truthlaidbear.com/porkbusters/index.php
There's never a vest bomb handy when you need one, eh? ;>)
That he almost met the maker when he reached for some clothes in the drawer is, to say the least, about the most maddening situation I can think of myself being in, and over effing taxes at that!
If I ever get the big "C", I'd like to take one of those jackboot's bosses along for the ride! Well, one can dream.
Boy and howdy.
Too bad ther were just as many Reps among them as Rats. Rockefeller being the kingpin and behind him the banks of the House of Rothschild. The very same sobs who Jackson shot down with his veto of the 2nd bank of the US's rechartering.
Please read it in my list of links previous to this post on this thread.
They did even worse with the Fedl Reserve Act - even naming it so that it didn't appear to be a Central Bank like the first two failures of elite theft of the taxpayer, which was a private corporation Govt privileged monopoly.
Read Jackson's veto please!
Jackson's 2nd Bank US VETO (very important - what he correctly and constitutionally opposed is just what we ended up with in 1913 foisted upon us by the same int'l banking cabal)
http://alpha.furman.edu/~benson/docs/ajveto.htm
Child protection agencies can screw up your life (and your kids as well) with nothing but a simple allegation.
Come to think of it, the quality of your credit on your credit report also tends to be a "guilty until proven innocent" thing. And in the current environment, unless you are looking to flip burgers, it can keep you from getting a job.
We are indeed in interesting times...
just checked out http://www.freedomtofacism.com/
These are the goals of the movie:
* Stop the polarization of America
* Stop the domination of the Democratic and Republican parties over our political system
* Shut down the Federal Reserve system
* Return America's gold to Fort Knox and have it audit
* Have Congress and the IRS, in a public forum, reveal the law that requires Americans to pay a direct, unapportioned tax on their labor.
* Make computerized voting illegal in all 50 states
* Keep the internet free and out of the control of large institutions
* Rescind the law called the Real ID Act so Americans never have to carry a National ID Card
* Make it illegal to implant RFID chips in human beings
* Educate juries to the fact that they have the right to determine the law as well as the facts of a case
* Educate juries to the fact that they are not obligated to follow the instructions of a judge
* Stop Globalization because it is the path to a one world government
* Protect our borders
* Restore the environment
* Put an end to the Patriot Act
While I can support many of the producer's points, there are some which are completely irrational and contradictory... such as ending the Patriot Act (unless, of course, his proposal is to end it when the WOT is won). His proposal to "stop globalism" is another... Historically, free trade and multinationalist companies have been a benefit to mankind. The problem is that in recent years, it has transgressed the boundaries of rational self-interest, joined with political ambition, and morphed into something which serves only a select few.
Sorry, that would be http://www.freedomtofascism.com/
What do you all think of New American magazine???
It was sold as a soak the rich scheme against the "robber barons".
Ping for later read.
Yup - by the Robber Barons themselves who always had trusts and foundations to shelter their wealth from taxes, and/or secret Swiss bank accounts.
Kerry paid 12% on his income of millions, yet he calls for higher taxes he knows he'll never have to pay.
Historically, free trade and multinationalist companies have been a benefit to mankind. The problem is that in recent years, it has transgressed the boundaries of rational self-interest, joined with political ambition, and morphed into something which serves only a select few.
Correct - it the very interventionism of Govt that costs taxpayers and enriches elites.
See the links posted earlier here please.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.