Was it Rush yesterday who said that a lot of the money NY received initially was for projects that have now been completed? If so, PK should stop behaving like a spoiled brat who had his milk money stolen.
There is no way to guarantee security and just because some projects are completed hardly means the threat is greatly reduced.
The demand will not drop but in fact may grow larger as other soft targets are chosen.
Peter King is 100% right to be making this fight. He's correct on the merits of the case and his criticism of how the formula was determined. He's correct on criticizing Homeland Seucrity officials who claimed that NY wanted to spend the money outside of the approved methods.
Peter King let that official have it and said NY can demonstrate the appropriate expenditure of ALL funds.
Peter King is right on immigration and also security here.
And God Bless him for it.
< /heavy sarcasm, just in case someone takes the above seriously >